net: openvswitch: ovs_ct_exit to be done under ovs_lock
syzbot wrote: | ============================= | WARNING: suspicious RCU usage | 5.7.0-rc1+ #45 Not tainted | ----------------------------- | net/openvswitch/conntrack.c:1898 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!! | | other info that might help us debug this: | rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1 | ... | | stack backtrace: | Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-0-ga698c8995f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 | Workqueue: netns cleanup_net | Call Trace: | ... | ovs_ct_exit | ovs_exit_net | ops_exit_list.isra.7 | cleanup_net | process_one_work | worker_thread To avoid that warning, invoke the ovs_ct_exit under ovs_lock and add lockdep_ovsl_is_held as optional lockdep expression. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/000000000000e642a905a0cbee6e@google.com Fixes: 11efd5cb04a1 ("openvswitch: Support conntrack zone limit") Cc: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@ovn.org> Cc: Yi-Hung Wei <yihung.wei@gmail.com> Reported-by: syzbot+7ef50afd3a211f879112@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Tonghao Zhang <xiangxia.m.yue@gmail.com> Acked-by: Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@ovn.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9bacd256f1
commit
27de77cec9
@ -1895,7 +1895,8 @@ static void ovs_ct_limit_exit(struct net *net, struct ovs_net *ovs_net)
|
||||
struct hlist_head *head = &info->limits[i];
|
||||
struct ovs_ct_limit *ct_limit;
|
||||
|
||||
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(ct_limit, head, hlist_node)
|
||||
hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(ct_limit, head, hlist_node,
|
||||
lockdep_ovsl_is_held())
|
||||
kfree_rcu(ct_limit, rcu);
|
||||
}
|
||||
kfree(ovs_net->ct_limit_info->limits);
|
||||
|
@ -2466,8 +2466,10 @@ static void __net_exit ovs_exit_net(struct net *dnet)
|
||||
struct net *net;
|
||||
LIST_HEAD(head);
|
||||
|
||||
ovs_ct_exit(dnet);
|
||||
ovs_lock();
|
||||
|
||||
ovs_ct_exit(dnet);
|
||||
|
||||
list_for_each_entry_safe(dp, dp_next, &ovs_net->dps, list_node)
|
||||
__dp_destroy(dp);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user