iv/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

s390/mm,fault: use __ratelimit() instead of printk_ratelimit()

Browse Source 
Just like other architectures make use __ratelimit() instead of
printk_ratelimit().

Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
Heiko Carstens 2023-10-12 09:40:32 +02:00 committed by Vasily Gorbik
parent 7c915a84e5
commit 28f3e0002a
1 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
arch/s390/mm/fault.c
View File

@ -218,11 +218,13 @@ int show_unhandled_signals = 1;
void report_user_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, long signr, int is_mm_fault)
{
static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
if ((task_pid_nr(current) > 1) && !show_unhandled_signals)
return;
if (!unhandled_signal(current, signr))
return;
if (!printk_ratelimit())
if (!__ratelimit(&rs))
return;
printk(KERN_ALERT "User process fault: interruption code %04x ilc:%d ",
regs->int_code & 0xffff, regs->int_code >> 17);