flat: tweak default stack alignment
The recent commit 1f0ce8b3dd667dca7 ("mm: Move ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN and ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN to <linux/slab_def.h>") which moved the ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN default into the global header inadvertently broke FLAT for a bunch of systems. Blackfin systems now fail on any FLAT exec with: Unable to read code+data+bss, errno 14 When your /init is a FLAT binary, obviously this can be annoying ;). This stems from the alignment usage in the FLAT loader. The behavior before was that FLAT would default to ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN only if it was defined, and this was only defined by arches when they wanted a larger alignment value. Otherwise it'd default to pointer alignment. Arguably, this is kind of hokey that the FLAT is semi-abusing defines it shouldn't. So let's merge the two alignment requirements so the floor is never 0. Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Cc: David McCullough <davidm@snapgear.com> Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Cc: Hirokazu Takata <takata@linux-m32r.org> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
12c46b3365
commit
2952095c6b
@ -68,11 +68,7 @@
|
||||
* Here we can be a bit looser than the data sections since this
|
||||
* needs to only meet arch ABI requirements.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#ifdef ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN
|
||||
#define FLAT_STACK_ALIGN (ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN)
|
||||
#else
|
||||
#define FLAT_STACK_ALIGN (sizeof(void *))
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
#define FLAT_STACK_ALIGN max_t(unsigned long, sizeof(void *), ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN)
|
||||
|
||||
#define RELOC_FAILED 0xff00ff01 /* Relocation incorrect somewhere */
|
||||
#define UNLOADED_LIB 0x7ff000ff /* Placeholder for unused library */
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user