staging: lustre: ptlrpc: skip lock if export failed
[ Upstream commit 4c43c27ddc461d8473cedd70f2549614641dfbc7 ] This patch resolves IO vs eviction race. After eviction failed export stayed at stale list, a client had IO processing and reconnected during it. A client sent brw rpc with last lock cookie and new connection. The lock with failed export was found and assert was happened. (ost_handler.c:1812:ost_prolong_lock_one()) ASSERTION( lock->l_export == opd->opd_exp ) failed: 1. Skip the lock at ldlm_handle2lock if lock export failed. 2. Validation of lock for IO was added at hpreq_check(). The lock searching is based on granted interval tree. If server doesn`t have a valid lock, it reply to client with ESTALE. Signed-off-by: Alexander Boyko <alexander.boyko@seagate.com> Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-7702 Seagate-bug-id: MRP-2787 Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/18120 Reviewed-by: Fan Yong <fan.yong@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Vitaly Fertman <vitaly.fertman@seagate.com> Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
efa8f1b7a6
commit
2d097e5f5c
@ -550,6 +550,13 @@ struct ldlm_lock *__ldlm_handle2lock(const struct lustre_handle *handle,
|
||||
if (lock == NULL)
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
if (lock->l_export && lock->l_export->exp_failed) {
|
||||
CDEBUG(D_INFO, "lock export failed: lock %p, exp %p\n",
|
||||
lock, lock->l_export);
|
||||
LDLM_LOCK_PUT(lock);
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* It's unlikely but possible that someone marked the lock as
|
||||
* destroyed after we did handle2object on it */
|
||||
if (flags == 0 && ((lock->l_flags & LDLM_FL_DESTROYED) == 0)) {
|
||||
|
@ -1240,20 +1240,15 @@ static int ptlrpc_server_hpreq_init(struct ptlrpc_service_part *svcpt,
|
||||
* it may hit swab race at LU-1044. */
|
||||
if (req->rq_ops->hpreq_check) {
|
||||
rc = req->rq_ops->hpreq_check(req);
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* XXX: Out of all current
|
||||
* ptlrpc_hpreq_ops::hpreq_check(), only
|
||||
* ldlm_cancel_hpreq_check() can return an error code;
|
||||
* other functions assert in similar places, which seems
|
||||
* odd. What also does not seem right is that handlers
|
||||
* for those RPCs do not assert on the same checks, but
|
||||
* rather handle the error cases. e.g. see
|
||||
* ost_rw_hpreq_check(), and ost_brw_read(),
|
||||
* ost_brw_write().
|
||||
if (rc == -ESTALE) {
|
||||
req->rq_status = rc;
|
||||
ptlrpc_error(req);
|
||||
}
|
||||
/** can only return error,
|
||||
* 0 for normal request,
|
||||
* or 1 for high priority request
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (rc < 0)
|
||||
return rc;
|
||||
LASSERT(rc == 0 || rc == 1);
|
||||
LASSERT(rc <= 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_bh(&req->rq_export->exp_rpc_lock);
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user