iv/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[PATCH] ppc64: fix up()/down() usage for kprobe_mutex

Browse Source 
The incorrect kprobe_mutex usage on x86_64 had percolated to ppc64 too.
First noticed by Yanmin Zhang.

Signed-off-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli 2005-10-01 13:14:17 -04:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent 702c96d550
commit 2d8ab6ad6e
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
arch/ppc64/kernel/kprobes.c
View File

@ -59,9 +59,9 @@ int __kprobes arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
/* insn must be on a special executable page on ppc64 */
if (!ret) {
up(&kprobe_mutex);
p->ainsn.insn = get_insn_slot();
down(&kprobe_mutex);
p->ainsn.insn = get_insn_slot();
up(&kprobe_mutex);
if (!p->ainsn.insn)
ret = -ENOMEM;
}
@ -90,9 +90,9 @@ void __kprobes arch_disarm_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
void __kprobes arch_remove_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
{
up(&kprobe_mutex);
free_insn_slot(p->ainsn.insn);
down(&kprobe_mutex);
free_insn_slot(p->ainsn.insn);
up(&kprobe_mutex);
}
static inline void prepare_singlestep(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs)