xen-blkback: workaround compiler bug in gcc 4.1
The code generat with gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-54) creates an unbound loop for the second foreach_grant_safe loop in purge_persistent_gnt. The workaround is to avoid having this second loop and instead perform all the work inside the first loop by adding a new variable, clean_used, that will be set when all the desired persistent grants have been removed and we need to iterate over the remaining ones to remove the WAS_ACTIVE flag. Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com> Reported-by: Tom O'Neill <toneill@vmem.com> Reported-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8e3f875554
commit
2d9105433f
@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ static void purge_persistent_gnt(struct xen_blkif *blkif)
|
||||
struct persistent_gnt *persistent_gnt;
|
||||
struct rb_node *n;
|
||||
unsigned int num_clean, total;
|
||||
bool scan_used = false;
|
||||
bool scan_used = false, clean_used = false;
|
||||
struct rb_root *root;
|
||||
|
||||
if (blkif->persistent_gnt_c < xen_blkif_max_pgrants ||
|
||||
@ -358,9 +358,8 @@ static void purge_persistent_gnt(struct xen_blkif *blkif)
|
||||
num_clean = (xen_blkif_max_pgrants / 100) * LRU_PERCENT_CLEAN;
|
||||
num_clean = blkif->persistent_gnt_c - xen_blkif_max_pgrants + num_clean;
|
||||
num_clean = min(blkif->persistent_gnt_c, num_clean);
|
||||
if (num_clean >
|
||||
(blkif->persistent_gnt_c -
|
||||
atomic_read(&blkif->persistent_gnt_in_use)))
|
||||
if ((num_clean == 0) ||
|
||||
(num_clean > (blkif->persistent_gnt_c - atomic_read(&blkif->persistent_gnt_in_use))))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -383,6 +382,11 @@ purge_list:
|
||||
BUG_ON(persistent_gnt->handle ==
|
||||
BLKBACK_INVALID_HANDLE);
|
||||
|
||||
if (clean_used) {
|
||||
clear_bit(PERSISTENT_GNT_WAS_ACTIVE, persistent_gnt->flags);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (test_bit(PERSISTENT_GNT_ACTIVE, persistent_gnt->flags))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
if (!scan_used &&
|
||||
@ -400,18 +404,18 @@ purge_list:
|
||||
* grants that were used since last purge in order to cope
|
||||
* with the requested num
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!scan_used) {
|
||||
if (!scan_used && !clean_used) {
|
||||
pr_debug(DRV_PFX "Still missing %u purged frames\n", num_clean);
|
||||
scan_used = true;
|
||||
goto purge_list;
|
||||
}
|
||||
finished:
|
||||
/* Remove the "used" flag from all the persistent grants */
|
||||
foreach_grant_safe(persistent_gnt, n, root, node) {
|
||||
BUG_ON(persistent_gnt->handle ==
|
||||
BLKBACK_INVALID_HANDLE);
|
||||
clear_bit(PERSISTENT_GNT_WAS_ACTIVE, persistent_gnt->flags);
|
||||
if (!clean_used) {
|
||||
pr_debug(DRV_PFX "Finished scanning for grants to clean, removing used flag\n");
|
||||
clean_used = true;
|
||||
goto purge_list;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
blkif->persistent_gnt_c -= (total - num_clean);
|
||||
blkif->vbd.overflow_max_grants = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user