bpf: Support dual-stack sockets in bpf_tcp_check_syncookie
bpf_tcp_gen_syncookie looks at the IP version in the IP header and
validates the address family of the socket. It supports IPv4 packets in
AF_INET6 dual-stack sockets.
On the other hand, bpf_tcp_check_syncookie looks only at the address
family of the socket, ignoring the real IP version in headers, and
validates only the packet size. This implementation has some drawbacks:
1. Packets are not validated properly, allowing a BPF program to trick
bpf_tcp_check_syncookie into handling an IPv6 packet on an IPv4
socket.
2. Dual-stack sockets fail the checks on IPv4 packets. IPv4 clients end
up receiving a SYNACK with the cookie, but the following ACK gets
dropped.
This patch fixes these issues by changing the checks in
bpf_tcp_check_syncookie to match the ones in bpf_tcp_gen_syncookie. IP
version from the header is taken into account, and it is validated
properly with address family.
Fixes: 3990408470
("bpf: add helper to check for a valid SYN cookie")
Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Arthur Fabre <afabre@cloudflare.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220406124113.2795730-1-maximmi@nvidia.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
0a210af6d0
commit
2e8702cc0c
@ -7016,24 +7016,33 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_tcp_check_syncookie, struct sock *, sk, void *, iph, u32, iph_len
|
||||
if (!th->ack || th->rst || th->syn)
|
||||
return -ENOENT;
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(iph_len < sizeof(struct iphdr)))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
if (tcp_synq_no_recent_overflow(sk))
|
||||
return -ENOENT;
|
||||
|
||||
cookie = ntohl(th->ack_seq) - 1;
|
||||
|
||||
switch (sk->sk_family) {
|
||||
case AF_INET:
|
||||
if (unlikely(iph_len < sizeof(struct iphdr)))
|
||||
/* Both struct iphdr and struct ipv6hdr have the version field at the
|
||||
* same offset so we can cast to the shorter header (struct iphdr).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
switch (((struct iphdr *)iph)->version) {
|
||||
case 4:
|
||||
if (sk->sk_family == AF_INET6 && ipv6_only_sock(sk))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = __cookie_v4_check((struct iphdr *)iph, th, cookie);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
#if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_IPV6)
|
||||
case AF_INET6:
|
||||
case 6:
|
||||
if (unlikely(iph_len < sizeof(struct ipv6hdr)))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
if (sk->sk_family != AF_INET6)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = __cookie_v6_check((struct ipv6hdr *)iph, th, cookie);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_IPV6 */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user