drm/i915: fix build for CONFIG_BUG=n
If CONFIG_BUG=n __WARN_printf won't be defined leading to the below build failure. The double underscores should have told us to steer clear of it anyway. drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c: In function ‘assert_pll’: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c:1027:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘__WARN_printf’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] I915_STATE_WARN(cur_state != state, Use WARN(1, ...) instead. It handles CONFIG_BUG=n gracefully and, with the constant condition, a sane compiler should reduce it to __WARN_printf. This is a regression introduced by commit e2c719b75c8c186deb86570d8466df9e9eff919b Author: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Date: Mon Dec 15 13:56:32 2014 -0500 drm/i915: tame the chattermouth (v2) Reported-by: Jim Davis <jim.epost@gmail.com> Reference: http://mid.gmane.org/CA+r1ZhgHTi7bS2irhtuSUs9aO=Br1dumN8=oAOeaMJDZ_ZhwBw@mail.gmail.com Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0a87a2db48
commit
2f3408c7ef
@ -83,7 +83,7 @@
|
||||
int __ret_warn_on = !!(condition); \
|
||||
if (unlikely(__ret_warn_on)) { \
|
||||
if (i915.verbose_state_checks) \
|
||||
__WARN_printf(format); \
|
||||
WARN(1, format); \
|
||||
else \
|
||||
DRM_ERROR(format); \
|
||||
} \
|
||||
@ -94,7 +94,7 @@
|
||||
int __ret_warn_on = !!(condition); \
|
||||
if (unlikely(__ret_warn_on)) { \
|
||||
if (i915.verbose_state_checks) \
|
||||
__WARN_printf("WARN_ON(" #condition ")\n"); \
|
||||
WARN(1, "WARN_ON(" #condition ")\n"); \
|
||||
else \
|
||||
DRM_ERROR("WARN_ON(" #condition ")\n"); \
|
||||
} \
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user