PCI: Don't set BAR to zero if dma_addr_t is too small
If a BAR is above 4GB and our dma_addr_t is too small, don't clear the BAR to zero: that doesn't disable the BAR, and it makes it more likely that the BAR will conflict with things if we turn on the memory enable bit (as we will at "out:" if the device was already enabled at the handoff). We should also print the BAR info and its original size so we can follow the process when we try to assign space to it. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
72dc5601fe
commit
31e9dd2565
@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ int __pci_read_base(struct pci_dev *dev, enum pci_bar_type type,
|
||||
u64 l64, sz64, mask64;
|
||||
u16 orig_cmd;
|
||||
struct pci_bus_region region, inverted_region;
|
||||
bool bar_too_big = false, bar_disabled = false;
|
||||
bool bar_too_big = false, bar_too_high = false;
|
||||
|
||||
mask = type ? PCI_ROM_ADDRESS_MASK : ~0;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -254,13 +254,11 @@ int __pci_read_base(struct pci_dev *dev, enum pci_bar_type type,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if ((sizeof(dma_addr_t) < 8) && l) {
|
||||
/* Address above 32-bit boundary; disable the BAR */
|
||||
pci_write_config_dword(dev, pos, 0);
|
||||
pci_write_config_dword(dev, pos + 4, 0);
|
||||
/* Above 32-bit boundary; try to reallocate */
|
||||
res->flags |= IORESOURCE_UNSET;
|
||||
res->start = 0;
|
||||
res->end = sz64;
|
||||
bar_disabled = true;
|
||||
bar_too_high = true;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
region.start = l64;
|
||||
@ -311,7 +309,10 @@ out:
|
||||
if (bar_too_big)
|
||||
dev_err(&dev->dev, "reg 0x%x: can't handle BAR larger than 4GB (size %#010llx)\n",
|
||||
pos, (unsigned long long) sz64);
|
||||
if (res->flags && !bar_disabled)
|
||||
if (bar_too_high)
|
||||
dev_info(&dev->dev, "reg 0x%x: can't handle BAR above 4G (bus address %#010llx)\n",
|
||||
pos, (unsigned long long) l64);
|
||||
if (res->flags)
|
||||
dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &dev->dev, "reg 0x%x: %pR\n", pos, res);
|
||||
|
||||
return (res->flags & IORESOURCE_MEM_64) ? 1 : 0;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user