enic: initialize enic->rfs_h.lock in enic_probe
lockdep spotted that we are using rfs_h.lock in enic_get_rxnfc() without initializing. rfs_h.lock is initialized in enic_open(). But ethtool_ops can be called when interface is down. Move enic_rfs_flw_tbl_init to enic_probe. INFO: trying to register non-static key. the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation. turning off the locking correctness validator. CPU: 18 PID: 1189 Comm: ethtool Not tainted 4.17.0-rc7-devel+ #27 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-20171110_100015-anatol 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack+0x85/0xc0 register_lock_class+0x550/0x560 ? __handle_mm_fault+0xa8b/0x1100 __lock_acquire+0x81/0x670 lock_acquire+0xb9/0x1e0 ? enic_get_rxnfc+0x139/0x2b0 [enic] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x38/0x80 ? enic_get_rxnfc+0x139/0x2b0 [enic] enic_get_rxnfc+0x139/0x2b0 [enic] ethtool_get_rxnfc+0x8d/0x1c0 dev_ethtool+0x16c8/0x2400 ? __mutex_lock+0x64d/0xa00 ? dev_load+0x6a/0x150 dev_ioctl+0x253/0x4b0 sock_do_ioctl+0x9a/0x130 sock_ioctl+0x1af/0x350 do_vfs_ioctl+0x8e/0x670 ? syscall_trace_enter+0x1e2/0x380 ksys_ioctl+0x60/0x90 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x16/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x170 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe Signed-off-by: Govindarajulu Varadarajan <gvaradar@cisco.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d1a65e21f1
commit
3256d29fc7
@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ void enic_rfs_flw_tbl_init(struct enic *enic)
|
||||
enic->rfs_h.max = enic->config.num_arfs;
|
||||
enic->rfs_h.free = enic->rfs_h.max;
|
||||
enic->rfs_h.toclean = 0;
|
||||
enic_rfs_timer_start(enic);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void enic_rfs_flw_tbl_free(struct enic *enic)
|
||||
@ -88,7 +87,6 @@ void enic_rfs_flw_tbl_free(struct enic *enic)
|
||||
|
||||
enic_rfs_timer_stop(enic);
|
||||
spin_lock_bh(&enic->rfs_h.lock);
|
||||
enic->rfs_h.free = 0;
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < (1 << ENIC_RFS_FLW_BITSHIFT); i++) {
|
||||
struct hlist_head *hhead;
|
||||
struct hlist_node *tmp;
|
||||
@ -99,6 +97,7 @@ void enic_rfs_flw_tbl_free(struct enic *enic)
|
||||
enic_delfltr(enic, n->fltr_id);
|
||||
hlist_del(&n->node);
|
||||
kfree(n);
|
||||
enic->rfs_h.free++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock_bh(&enic->rfs_h.lock);
|
||||
|
@ -1971,7 +1971,7 @@ static int enic_open(struct net_device *netdev)
|
||||
vnic_intr_unmask(&enic->intr[i]);
|
||||
|
||||
enic_notify_timer_start(enic);
|
||||
enic_rfs_flw_tbl_init(enic);
|
||||
enic_rfs_timer_start(enic);
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2904,6 +2904,7 @@ static int enic_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
|
||||
|
||||
timer_setup(&enic->notify_timer, enic_notify_timer, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
enic_rfs_flw_tbl_init(enic);
|
||||
enic_set_rx_coal_setting(enic);
|
||||
INIT_WORK(&enic->reset, enic_reset);
|
||||
INIT_WORK(&enic->tx_hang_reset, enic_tx_hang_reset);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user