page_pool: fix inconsistency for page_pool_ring_[un]lock()
page_pool_ring_[un]lock() use in_softirq() to decide which
spin lock variant to use, and when they are called in the
context with in_softirq() being false, spin_lock_bh() is
called in page_pool_ring_lock() while spin_unlock() is
called in page_pool_ring_unlock(), because spin_lock_bh()
has disabled the softirq in page_pool_ring_lock(), which
causes inconsistency for spin lock pair calling.
This patch fixes it by returning in_softirq state from
page_pool_producer_lock(), and use it to decide which
spin lock variant to use in page_pool_producer_unlock().
As pool->ring has both producer and consumer lock, so
rename it to page_pool_producer_[un]lock() to reflect
the actual usage. Also move them to page_pool.c as they
are only used there, and remove the 'inline' as the
compiler may have better idea to do inlining or not.
Fixes: 7886244736
("net: page_pool: Add bulk support for ptr_ring")
Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230522031714.5089-1-linyunsheng@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3632679d9e
commit
368d3cb406
@ -399,22 +399,4 @@ static inline void page_pool_nid_changed(struct page_pool *pool, int new_nid)
|
||||
page_pool_update_nid(pool, new_nid);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void page_pool_ring_lock(struct page_pool *pool)
|
||||
__acquires(&pool->ring.producer_lock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (in_softirq())
|
||||
spin_lock(&pool->ring.producer_lock);
|
||||
else
|
||||
spin_lock_bh(&pool->ring.producer_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void page_pool_ring_unlock(struct page_pool *pool)
|
||||
__releases(&pool->ring.producer_lock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (in_softirq())
|
||||
spin_unlock(&pool->ring.producer_lock);
|
||||
else
|
||||
spin_unlock_bh(&pool->ring.producer_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* _NET_PAGE_POOL_H */
|
||||
|
@ -134,6 +134,29 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(page_pool_ethtool_stats_get);
|
||||
#define recycle_stat_add(pool, __stat, val)
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
static bool page_pool_producer_lock(struct page_pool *pool)
|
||||
__acquires(&pool->ring.producer_lock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bool in_softirq = in_softirq();
|
||||
|
||||
if (in_softirq)
|
||||
spin_lock(&pool->ring.producer_lock);
|
||||
else
|
||||
spin_lock_bh(&pool->ring.producer_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
return in_softirq;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void page_pool_producer_unlock(struct page_pool *pool,
|
||||
bool in_softirq)
|
||||
__releases(&pool->ring.producer_lock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (in_softirq)
|
||||
spin_unlock(&pool->ring.producer_lock);
|
||||
else
|
||||
spin_unlock_bh(&pool->ring.producer_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int page_pool_init(struct page_pool *pool,
|
||||
const struct page_pool_params *params)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -617,6 +640,7 @@ void page_pool_put_page_bulk(struct page_pool *pool, void **data,
|
||||
int count)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int i, bulk_len = 0;
|
||||
bool in_softirq;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
|
||||
struct page *page = virt_to_head_page(data[i]);
|
||||
@ -635,7 +659,7 @@ void page_pool_put_page_bulk(struct page_pool *pool, void **data,
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Bulk producer into ptr_ring page_pool cache */
|
||||
page_pool_ring_lock(pool);
|
||||
in_softirq = page_pool_producer_lock(pool);
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < bulk_len; i++) {
|
||||
if (__ptr_ring_produce(&pool->ring, data[i])) {
|
||||
/* ring full */
|
||||
@ -644,7 +668,7 @@ void page_pool_put_page_bulk(struct page_pool *pool, void **data,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
recycle_stat_add(pool, ring, i);
|
||||
page_pool_ring_unlock(pool);
|
||||
page_pool_producer_unlock(pool, in_softirq);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Hopefully all pages was return into ptr_ring */
|
||||
if (likely(i == bulk_len))
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user