iv/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[SCSI] scsi_transport_fc: Protect against overflow in dev_loss_tmo

Browse Source 
The rport structure defines dev_loss_tmo as u32, which is
later multiplied with HZ to get the actual timeout value.
This might overflow for large dev_loss_tmo values. So we
should be better using u64 as intermediate variables here
to protect against overflow.

Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Acked-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
Hannes Reinecke 2010-03-09 10:18:48 +01:00 committed by James Bottomley
parent bb789d0162
commit 36dd288f0f
1 changed files with 8 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c
View File

@ -834,7 +834,7 @@ static ssize_t
store_fc_rport_dev_loss_tmo(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
const char *buf, size_t count)
{
int val;
unsigned long val;
struct fc_rport *rport = transport_class_to_rport(dev);
struct Scsi_Host *shost = rport_to_shost(rport);
struct fc_internal *i = to_fc_internal(shost->transportt);
@ -847,6 +847,12 @@ store_fc_rport_dev_loss_tmo(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
if ((*cp && (*cp != '\n')) || (val < 0))
return -EINVAL;
/*
* Check for overflow; dev_loss_tmo is u32
*/
if (val > UINT_MAX)
return -EINVAL;
/*
* If fast_io_fail is off we have to cap
* dev_loss_tmo at SCSI_DEVICE_BLOCK_MAX_TIMEOUT
@ -2865,7 +2871,7 @@ void
fc_remote_port_delete(struct fc_rport *rport)
{
struct Scsi_Host *shost = rport_to_shost(rport);
int timeout = rport->dev_loss_tmo;
unsigned long timeout = rport->dev_loss_tmo;
unsigned long flags;
/*