mm: memcontrol: eliminate redundant check in __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded()
The mz->usage_in_excess >= mz_node->usage_in_excess check is exactly the else case of mz->usage_in_excess < mz_node->usage_in_excess. So we could replace else if (mz->usage_in_excess >= mz_node->usage_in_excess) with else equally. Also drop the comment which doesn't really explain much. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201012131607.10656-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1a984c4e82
commit
378876b0e3
@ -623,14 +623,9 @@ static void __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(struct mem_cgroup_per_node *mz,
|
||||
if (mz->usage_in_excess < mz_node->usage_in_excess) {
|
||||
p = &(*p)->rb_left;
|
||||
rightmost = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We can't avoid mem cgroups that are over their soft
|
||||
* limit by the same amount
|
||||
*/
|
||||
else if (mz->usage_in_excess >= mz_node->usage_in_excess)
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
p = &(*p)->rb_right;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (rightmost)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user