iv/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

bpf: Make some symbols static

Browse Source 
The sparse tool complains as follows:

kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4567:29: warning:
 symbol 'bpf_sys_bpf_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?
kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4592:29: warning:
 symbol 'bpf_sys_close_proto' was not declared. Should it be static?

This symbol is not used outside of syscall.c, so marks it static.

Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210519064116.240536-1-pulehui@huawei.com
This commit is contained in:
Pu Lehui 2021-05-19 14:41:16 +08:00 committed by Alexei Starovoitov
parent 5d67f34959
commit 3a2daa7248
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
kernel/bpf/syscall.c
View File

@ -4563,7 +4563,7 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_sys_bpf, int, cmd, void *, attr, u32, attr_size)
return __sys_bpf(cmd, KERNEL_BPFPTR(attr), attr_size);
}
const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sys_bpf_proto = {
static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sys_bpf_proto = {
.func = bpf_sys_bpf,
.gpl_only = false,
.ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
@ -4588,7 +4588,7 @@ BPF_CALL_1(bpf_sys_close, u32, fd)
return close_fd(fd);
}
const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sys_close_proto = {
static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sys_close_proto = {
.func = bpf_sys_close,
.gpl_only = false,
.ret_type = RET_INTEGER,