btrfs: fix warning while merging two adjacent extents
When we have two adjacent extents in relink_extent_backref,
we try to merge them. When we use btrfs_search_slot to locate the
slot for the current extent, we shouldn't set "ins_len = 1",
because we will merge it into the previous extent rather than
insert a new item. Otherwise, we may happen to create a new leaf
in btrfs_search_slot and path->slot[0] will be 0. Then we try to
fetch the previous item using "path->slots[0]--", and it will cause
a warning as follows:
[ 145.713385] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1796 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:5043 map_private_extent_buffer+0xd4/0xe0
[ 145.713387] btrfs bad mapping eb start 5337088
len 4096, wanted 167772306 8
...
[ 145.713462] [<ffffffffa034b1f4>] map_private_extent_buffer+0xd4/0xe0
[ 145.713476] [<ffffffffa030097a>] ? btrfs_free_path+0x2a/0x40
[ 145.713485] [<ffffffffa0340864>] btrfs_get_token_64+0x64/0xf0
[ 145.713498] [<ffffffffa033472c>] relink_extent_backref+0x41c/0x820
[ 145.713508] [<ffffffffa0334d69>] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x239/0xa80
I encounter this warning when running defrag having mkfs.btrfs
with option -M. At the same time there are read/writes & snapshots
running at background.
Signed-off-by: Gui Hecheng <guihc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9f03740a95
commit
3c9665df0c
@ -2314,7 +2314,7 @@ again:
|
||||
u64 extent_len;
|
||||
struct btrfs_key found_key;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = btrfs_search_slot(trans, root, &key, path, 1, 1);
|
||||
ret = btrfs_search_slot(trans, root, &key, path, 0, 1);
|
||||
if (ret < 0)
|
||||
goto out_free_path;
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user