x86/retpoline: Do the necessary fixup to the Zen3/4 srso return thunk for !SRSO
commit 0e110732473e14d6520e49d75d2c88ef7d46fe67 upstream. The srso_alias_untrain_ret() dummy thunk in the !CONFIG_MITIGATION_SRSO case is there only for the altenative in CALL_UNTRAIN_RET to have a symbol to resolve. However, testing with kernels which don't have CONFIG_MITIGATION_SRSO enabled, leads to the warning in patch_return() to fire: missing return thunk: srso_alias_untrain_ret+0x0/0x10-0x0: eb 0e 66 66 2e WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:826 apply_returns (arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:826 Put in a plain "ret" there so that gcc doesn't put a return thunk in in its place which special and gets checked. In addition: ERROR: modpost: "srso_alias_untrain_ret" [arch/x86/kvm/kvm-amd.ko] undefined! make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.modpost:145: Module.symvers] Chyba 1 make[1]: *** [/usr/src/linux-6.8.3/Makefile:1873: modpost] Chyba 2 make: *** [Makefile:240: __sub-make] Chyba 2 since !SRSO builds would use the dummy return thunk as reported by petr.pisar@atlas.cz, https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218679. Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202404020901.da75a60f-oliver.sang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/202404020901.da75a60f-oliver.sang@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
668b3074aa
commit
3ec21104c8
@ -222,8 +222,11 @@ SYM_CODE_END(srso_return_thunk)
|
||||
#define JMP_SRSO_UNTRAIN_RET "ud2"
|
||||
/* Dummy for the alternative in CALL_UNTRAIN_RET. */
|
||||
SYM_CODE_START(srso_alias_untrain_ret)
|
||||
RET
|
||||
ANNOTATE_UNRET_SAFE
|
||||
ret
|
||||
int3
|
||||
SYM_FUNC_END(srso_alias_untrain_ret)
|
||||
__EXPORT_THUNK(srso_alias_untrain_ret)
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_CPU_SRSO */
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_UNRET_ENTRY
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user