iv/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

selftests/bpf: Fix nanosleep for real this time

Browse Source 
Amazingly, some libc implementations don't call __NR_nanosleep syscall from
their nanosleep() APIs. Hammer it down with explicit syscall() call and never
get back to it again. Also simplify code for timespec initialization.

I verified that nanosleep is called w/ printk and in exactly same Linux image
that is used in Travis CI. So it should both sleep and call correct syscall.

v1->v2:
  - math is too hard, fix usec -> nsec convertion (Martin);
  - test_vmlinux has explicit nanosleep() call, convert that one as well.

Fixes: 4e1fd25d19e8 ("selftests/bpf: Fix usleep() implementation")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200314002743.3782677-1-andriin@fb.com
This commit is contained in:
Andrii Nakryiko 2020-03-13 17:27:43 -07:00 committed by Daniel Borkmann
parent cc9864a7aa
commit 41078907ee
2 changed files with 6 additions and 10 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/vmlinux.c
View File

@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ static void nsleep()
{
struct timespec ts = { .tv_nsec = MY_TV_NSEC };
(void)nanosleep(&ts, NULL);
(void)syscall(__NR_nanosleep, &ts, NULL);
}
void test_vmlinux(void)

14
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
View File

@ -35,16 +35,12 @@ struct prog_test_def {
*/
int usleep(useconds_t usec)
{
struct timespec ts;
struct timespec ts = {
.tv_sec = usec / 1000000,
.tv_nsec = (usec % 1000000) * 1000,
};
if (usec > 999999) {
ts.tv_sec = usec / 1000000;
ts.tv_nsec = usec % 1000000;
} else {
ts.tv_sec = 0;
ts.tv_nsec = usec;
}
return nanosleep(&ts, NULL);
return syscall(__NR_nanosleep, &ts, NULL);
}
static bool should_run(struct test_selector *sel, int num, const char *name)