nfsd4: fix gss-proxy 4.1 mounts for some AD principals
The principal name on a gss cred is used to setup the NFSv4.0 callback, which has to have a client principal name to authenticate to. That code wants the name to be in the form servicetype@hostname. rpc.svcgssd passes down such names (and passes down no principal name at all in the case the principal isn't a service principal). gss-proxy always passes down the principal name, and passes it down in the form servicetype/hostname@REALM. So we've been munging the name gss-proxy passes down into the format the NFSv4.0 callback code expects, or throwing away the name if we can't. Since the introduction of the MACH_CRED enforcement in NFSv4.1, we've also been using the principal name to verify that certain operations are done as the same principal as was used on the original EXCHANGE_ID call. For that application, the original name passed down by gss-proxy is also useful. Lack of that name in some cases was causing some kerberized NFSv4.1 mount failures in an Active Directory environment. This fix only works in the gss-proxy case. The fix for legacy rpc.svcgssd would be more involved, and rpc.svcgssd already has other problems in the AD case. Reported-and-tested-by: James Ralston <ralston@pobox.com> Acked-by: Simo Sorce <simo@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
920dd9bb7d
commit
414ca017a5
@ -1873,6 +1873,10 @@ static int copy_cred(struct svc_cred *target, struct svc_cred *source)
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = strdup_if_nonnull(&target->cr_principal, source->cr_principal);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
ret = strdup_if_nonnull(&target->cr_raw_principal,
|
||||
source->cr_raw_principal);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
target->cr_flavor = source->cr_flavor;
|
||||
@ -1978,6 +1982,9 @@ static bool mach_creds_match(struct nfs4_client *cl, struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
if (!svc_rqst_integrity_protected(rqstp))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
if (cl->cl_cred.cr_raw_principal)
|
||||
return 0 == strcmp(cl->cl_cred.cr_raw_principal,
|
||||
cr->cr_raw_principal);
|
||||
if (!cr->cr_principal)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
return 0 == strcmp(cl->cl_cred.cr_principal, cr->cr_principal);
|
||||
@ -2390,7 +2397,8 @@ nfsd4_exchange_id(struct svc_rqst *rqstp,
|
||||
* Which is a bug, really. Anyway, we can't enforce
|
||||
* MACH_CRED in that case, better to give up now:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!new->cl_cred.cr_principal) {
|
||||
if (!new->cl_cred.cr_principal &&
|
||||
!new->cl_cred.cr_raw_principal) {
|
||||
status = nfserr_serverfault;
|
||||
goto out_nolock;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -23,13 +23,19 @@ struct svc_cred {
|
||||
kgid_t cr_gid;
|
||||
struct group_info *cr_group_info;
|
||||
u32 cr_flavor; /* pseudoflavor */
|
||||
char *cr_principal; /* for gss */
|
||||
/* name of form servicetype/hostname@REALM, passed down by
|
||||
* gss-proxy: */
|
||||
char *cr_raw_principal;
|
||||
/* name of form servicetype@hostname, passed down by
|
||||
* rpc.svcgssd, or computed from the above: */
|
||||
char *cr_principal;
|
||||
struct gss_api_mech *cr_gss_mech;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void init_svc_cred(struct svc_cred *cred)
|
||||
{
|
||||
cred->cr_group_info = NULL;
|
||||
cred->cr_raw_principal = NULL;
|
||||
cred->cr_principal = NULL;
|
||||
cred->cr_gss_mech = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -38,6 +44,7 @@ static inline void free_svc_cred(struct svc_cred *cred)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (cred->cr_group_info)
|
||||
put_group_info(cred->cr_group_info);
|
||||
kfree(cred->cr_raw_principal);
|
||||
kfree(cred->cr_principal);
|
||||
gss_mech_put(cred->cr_gss_mech);
|
||||
init_svc_cred(cred);
|
||||
|
@ -326,6 +326,9 @@ int gssp_accept_sec_context_upcall(struct net *net,
|
||||
if (data->found_creds && client_name.data != NULL) {
|
||||
char *c;
|
||||
|
||||
data->creds.cr_raw_principal = kstrndup(client_name.data,
|
||||
client_name.len, GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
|
||||
data->creds.cr_principal = kstrndup(client_name.data,
|
||||
client_name.len, GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
if (data->creds.cr_principal) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user