bpf: fix 32-bit ALU op verification
32-bit ALU ops operate on 32-bit values and have 32-bit outputs.
Adjust the verifier accordingly.
Fixes: f1174f77b5
("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0c17d1d2c6
commit
468f6eafa6
@ -2017,6 +2017,10 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* WARNING: This function does calculations on 64-bit values, but the actual
|
||||
* execution may occur on 32-bit values. Therefore, things like bitshifts
|
||||
* need extra checks in the 32-bit case.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
|
||||
struct bpf_insn *insn,
|
||||
struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg,
|
||||
@ -2027,12 +2031,8 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
|
||||
bool src_known, dst_known;
|
||||
s64 smin_val, smax_val;
|
||||
u64 umin_val, umax_val;
|
||||
u64 insn_bitness = (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64) ? 64 : 32;
|
||||
|
||||
if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) != BPF_ALU64) {
|
||||
/* 32-bit ALU ops are (32,32)->64 */
|
||||
coerce_reg_to_size(dst_reg, 4);
|
||||
coerce_reg_to_size(&src_reg, 4);
|
||||
}
|
||||
smin_val = src_reg.smin_value;
|
||||
smax_val = src_reg.smax_value;
|
||||
umin_val = src_reg.umin_value;
|
||||
@ -2168,9 +2168,9 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
|
||||
__update_reg_bounds(dst_reg);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case BPF_LSH:
|
||||
if (umax_val > 63) {
|
||||
/* Shifts greater than 63 are undefined. This includes
|
||||
* shifts by a negative number.
|
||||
if (umax_val >= insn_bitness) {
|
||||
/* Shifts greater than 31 or 63 are undefined.
|
||||
* This includes shifts by a negative number.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, insn->dst_reg);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
@ -2196,9 +2196,9 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
|
||||
__update_reg_bounds(dst_reg);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case BPF_RSH:
|
||||
if (umax_val > 63) {
|
||||
/* Shifts greater than 63 are undefined. This includes
|
||||
* shifts by a negative number.
|
||||
if (umax_val >= insn_bitness) {
|
||||
/* Shifts greater than 31 or 63 are undefined.
|
||||
* This includes shifts by a negative number.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, insn->dst_reg);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
@ -2234,6 +2234,12 @@ static int adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) != BPF_ALU64) {
|
||||
/* 32-bit ALU ops are (32,32)->32 */
|
||||
coerce_reg_to_size(dst_reg, 4);
|
||||
coerce_reg_to_size(&src_reg, 4);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
__reg_deduce_bounds(dst_reg);
|
||||
__reg_bound_offset(dst_reg);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user