mm: more likely reclaim MADV_SEQUENTIAL mappings
File pages mapped only in sequentially read mappings are perfect reclaim canditates. This patch makes these mappings behave like weak references, their pages will be reclaimed unless they have a strong reference from a normal mapping as well. It changes the reclaim and the unmap path where they check if the page has been referenced. In both cases, accesses through sequentially read mappings will be ignored. Benchmark results from KOSAKI Motohiro: http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=122485301925098&w=2 Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de> Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Acked-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
64cdd548ff
commit
4917e5d049
@ -767,7 +767,8 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
|
||||
else {
|
||||
if (pte_dirty(ptent))
|
||||
set_page_dirty(page);
|
||||
if (pte_young(ptent))
|
||||
if (pte_young(ptent) &&
|
||||
likely(!VM_SequentialReadHint(vma)))
|
||||
mark_page_accessed(page);
|
||||
file_rss--;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
13
mm/rmap.c
13
mm/rmap.c
@ -360,8 +360,17 @@ static int page_referenced_one(struct page *page,
|
||||
goto out_unmap;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (ptep_clear_flush_young_notify(vma, address, pte))
|
||||
referenced++;
|
||||
if (ptep_clear_flush_young_notify(vma, address, pte)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Don't treat a reference through a sequentially read
|
||||
* mapping as such. If the page has been used in
|
||||
* another mapping, we will catch it; if this other
|
||||
* mapping is already gone, the unmap path will have
|
||||
* set PG_referenced or activated the page.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (likely(!VM_SequentialReadHint(vma)))
|
||||
referenced++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Pretend the page is referenced if the task has the
|
||||
swap token and is in the middle of a page fault. */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user