printk: use mutex lock to stop syslog_seq from going wild
Although syslog_seq and log_next_seq stuff are protected by logbuf_lock spin log, it's not enough. Say we have two processes A and B, and let syslog_seq = N, while log_next_seq = N + 1, and the two processes both come to syslog_print at almost the same time. And No matter which process get the spin lock first, it will increase syslog_seq by one, then release spin lock; thus later, another process increase syslog_seq by one again. In this case, syslog_seq is bigger than syslog_next_seq. And latter, it would make: wait_event_interruptiable(log_wait, syslog != log_next_seq) don't wait any more even there is no new write comes. Thus it introduce a infinite loop reading. I can easily see this kind of issue by the following steps: # cat /proc/kmsg # at meantime, I don't kill rsyslog # So they are the two processes. # xinit # I added drm.debug=6 in the kernel parameter line, # so that it will produce lots of message and let that # issue happen It's 100% reproducable on my side. And my disk will be filled up by /var/log/messages in a quite short time. So, introduce a mutex_lock to stop syslog_seq from going wild just like what devkmsg_read() does. It does fix this issue as expected. v2: use mutex_lock_interruptiable() instead (comments from Kay) Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Acked-By: Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e2ae715d66
commit
4a77a5a06e
@ -414,7 +414,9 @@ static ssize_t devkmsg_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
|
||||
if (!user)
|
||||
return -EBADF;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&user->lock);
|
||||
ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&user->lock);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
raw_spin_lock(&logbuf_lock);
|
||||
while (user->seq == log_next_seq) {
|
||||
if (file->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) {
|
||||
@ -976,6 +978,7 @@ int do_syslog(int type, char __user *buf, int len, bool from_file)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bool clear = false;
|
||||
static int saved_console_loglevel = -1;
|
||||
static DEFINE_MUTEX(syslog_mutex);
|
||||
int error;
|
||||
|
||||
error = check_syslog_permissions(type, from_file);
|
||||
@ -1002,11 +1005,17 @@ int do_syslog(int type, char __user *buf, int len, bool from_file)
|
||||
error = -EFAULT;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
error = wait_event_interruptible(log_wait,
|
||||
syslog_seq != log_next_seq);
|
||||
error = mutex_lock_interruptible(&syslog_mutex);
|
||||
if (error)
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
error = wait_event_interruptible(log_wait,
|
||||
syslog_seq != log_next_seq);
|
||||
if (error) {
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&syslog_mutex);
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
error = syslog_print(buf, len);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&syslog_mutex);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
/* Read/clear last kernel messages */
|
||||
case SYSLOG_ACTION_READ_CLEAR:
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user