isci: fix frame received locking
Updates to the frame_rcvd before need to be atomic with respect to when they are evaluated by libsas. Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7cafbf1bd5
commit
4cffe13e0d
@ -893,6 +893,7 @@ enum sci_status scic_sds_phy_frame_handler(struct scic_sds_phy *sci_phy,
|
||||
enum scic_sds_phy_states state = sci_phy->sm.current_state_id;
|
||||
struct scic_sds_controller *scic = sci_phy->owning_port->owning_controller;
|
||||
enum sci_status result;
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
|
||||
switch (state) {
|
||||
case SCI_PHY_SUB_AWAIT_IAF_UF: {
|
||||
@ -911,7 +912,9 @@ enum sci_status scic_sds_phy_frame_handler(struct scic_sds_phy *sci_phy,
|
||||
if (iaf.frame_type == 0) {
|
||||
u32 state;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&iphy->sas_phy.frame_rcvd_lock, flags);
|
||||
memcpy(&iphy->frame_rcvd.iaf, &iaf, sizeof(iaf));
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iphy->sas_phy.frame_rcvd_lock, flags);
|
||||
if (iaf.smp_tport) {
|
||||
/* We got the IAF for an expander PHY go to the final
|
||||
* state since there are no power requirements for
|
||||
@ -954,9 +957,11 @@ enum sci_status scic_sds_phy_frame_handler(struct scic_sds_phy *sci_phy,
|
||||
frame_index,
|
||||
(void **)&fis_frame_data);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&iphy->sas_phy.frame_rcvd_lock, flags);
|
||||
scic_sds_controller_copy_sata_response(&iphy->frame_rcvd.fis,
|
||||
frame_header,
|
||||
fis_frame_data);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iphy->sas_phy.frame_rcvd_lock, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
/* got IAF we can now go to the await spinup semaphore state */
|
||||
sci_change_state(&sci_phy->sm, SCI_PHY_SUB_FINAL);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user