sctp: get netns from asoc and ep base
Commit 312434617c
("sctp: cache netns in sctp_ep_common") set netns
in asoc and ep base since they're created, and it will never change.
It's a better way to get netns from asoc and ep base, comparing to
calling sock_net().
This patch is to replace them.
v1->v2:
- no change.
Suggested-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
committed by
David S. Miller
parent
26c97a2d82
commit
4e7696d90b
@ -2307,7 +2307,6 @@ int sctp_process_init(struct sctp_association *asoc, struct sctp_chunk *chunk,
|
||||
const union sctp_addr *peer_addr,
|
||||
struct sctp_init_chunk *peer_init, gfp_t gfp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct net *net = sock_net(asoc->base.sk);
|
||||
struct sctp_transport *transport;
|
||||
struct list_head *pos, *temp;
|
||||
union sctp_params param;
|
||||
@ -2363,8 +2362,8 @@ int sctp_process_init(struct sctp_association *asoc, struct sctp_chunk *chunk,
|
||||
* also give us an option to silently ignore the packet, which
|
||||
* is what we'll do here.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!net->sctp.addip_noauth &&
|
||||
(asoc->peer.asconf_capable && !asoc->peer.auth_capable)) {
|
||||
if (!asoc->base.net->sctp.addip_noauth &&
|
||||
(asoc->peer.asconf_capable && !asoc->peer.auth_capable)) {
|
||||
asoc->peer.addip_disabled_mask |= (SCTP_PARAM_ADD_IP |
|
||||
SCTP_PARAM_DEL_IP |
|
||||
SCTP_PARAM_SET_PRIMARY);
|
||||
@ -2491,9 +2490,9 @@ static int sctp_process_param(struct sctp_association *asoc,
|
||||
const union sctp_addr *peer_addr,
|
||||
gfp_t gfp)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct net *net = sock_net(asoc->base.sk);
|
||||
struct sctp_endpoint *ep = asoc->ep;
|
||||
union sctp_addr_param *addr_param;
|
||||
struct net *net = asoc->base.net;
|
||||
struct sctp_transport *t;
|
||||
enum sctp_scope scope;
|
||||
union sctp_addr addr;
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user