serial: pl011: implement workaround for CTS clear event issue
Problem Observed:
- interrupt status is set by rising or falling edge on CTS line
- interrupt status is cleared on a .0. to .1. transition of the
interrupt-clear register bit 1.
- interrupt-clear register is reset by hardware once the interrupt
status is .0..
Remark: It seems not possible to read this register back by the
CPU though, but internally this register exists.
- when simultaneous set and reset event on the interrupt status
happens, then the set-event has priority and the status remains
.1.. As a result the interrupt-clear register is not reset to
.0., and no new .0. to .1. transition can be detected on it when
writing a .1. to it.
This implies race condition, the clear must be performed at least
one UARTCLK the riding edge of CTS RIS interrupt.
Fix:
Instead of resetting UART as done in commit
c16d51a32b
"amba pl011: workaround for uart registers lockup" do the
following:
write .0. and then .1. to the interrupt-clear register to make
sure that this transition is detected. According to the datasheet
writing a .0. does not have any effect, but actually it allows to
reset the internal interrupt-clear register.
Take into account:
The .0. needs to last at least for one clk_uart clock period
(~ 38 MHz, 26.08ns)
This way we can do away with the tasklet and keep only a tiny
fix triggered by the variant flag introduced in this patch.
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Jaunet <guillaume.jaunet@stericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Christophe Arnal <christophe.arnal@stericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Locher <Matthias.Locher@stericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Rajanikanth H.V <rajanikanth.hv@stericsson.com>
Reviewed-by: Srinidhi Kasagar <srinidhi.kasagar@stericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e695b28664
commit
4fd0690bb0
@ -67,30 +67,6 @@
|
||||
#define UART_DR_ERROR (UART011_DR_OE|UART011_DR_BE|UART011_DR_PE|UART011_DR_FE)
|
||||
#define UART_DUMMY_DR_RX (1 << 16)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
#define UART_WA_SAVE_NR 14
|
||||
|
||||
static void pl011_lockup_wa(unsigned long data);
|
||||
static const u32 uart_wa_reg[UART_WA_SAVE_NR] = {
|
||||
ST_UART011_DMAWM,
|
||||
ST_UART011_TIMEOUT,
|
||||
ST_UART011_LCRH_RX,
|
||||
UART011_IBRD,
|
||||
UART011_FBRD,
|
||||
ST_UART011_LCRH_TX,
|
||||
UART011_IFLS,
|
||||
ST_UART011_XFCR,
|
||||
ST_UART011_XON1,
|
||||
ST_UART011_XON2,
|
||||
ST_UART011_XOFF1,
|
||||
ST_UART011_XOFF2,
|
||||
UART011_CR,
|
||||
UART011_IMSC
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static u32 uart_wa_regdata[UART_WA_SAVE_NR];
|
||||
static DECLARE_TASKLET(pl011_lockup_tlet, pl011_lockup_wa, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
/* There is by now at least one vendor with differing details, so handle it */
|
||||
struct vendor_data {
|
||||
unsigned int ifls;
|
||||
@ -100,6 +76,7 @@ struct vendor_data {
|
||||
bool oversampling;
|
||||
bool interrupt_may_hang; /* vendor-specific */
|
||||
bool dma_threshold;
|
||||
bool cts_event_workaround;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static struct vendor_data vendor_arm = {
|
||||
@ -109,6 +86,7 @@ static struct vendor_data vendor_arm = {
|
||||
.lcrh_rx = UART011_LCRH,
|
||||
.oversampling = false,
|
||||
.dma_threshold = false,
|
||||
.cts_event_workaround = false,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static struct vendor_data vendor_st = {
|
||||
@ -119,6 +97,7 @@ static struct vendor_data vendor_st = {
|
||||
.oversampling = true,
|
||||
.interrupt_may_hang = true,
|
||||
.dma_threshold = true,
|
||||
.cts_event_workaround = true,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static struct uart_amba_port *amba_ports[UART_NR];
|
||||
@ -1054,69 +1033,6 @@ static inline bool pl011_dma_rx_running(struct uart_amba_port *uap)
|
||||
#define pl011_dma_flush_buffer NULL
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* pl011_lockup_wa
|
||||
* This workaround aims to break the deadlock situation
|
||||
* when after long transfer over uart in hardware flow
|
||||
* control, uart interrupt registers cannot be cleared.
|
||||
* Hence uart transfer gets blocked.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* It is seen that during such deadlock condition ICR
|
||||
* don't get cleared even on multiple write. This leads
|
||||
* pass_counter to decrease and finally reach zero. This
|
||||
* can be taken as trigger point to run this UART_BT_WA.
|
||||
*
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void pl011_lockup_wa(unsigned long data)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct uart_amba_port *uap = amba_ports[0];
|
||||
void __iomem *base = uap->port.membase;
|
||||
struct circ_buf *xmit = &uap->port.state->xmit;
|
||||
struct tty_struct *tty = uap->port.state->port.tty;
|
||||
int buf_empty_retries = 200;
|
||||
int loop;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Stop HCI layer from submitting data for tx */
|
||||
tty->hw_stopped = 1;
|
||||
while (!uart_circ_empty(xmit)) {
|
||||
if (buf_empty_retries-- == 0)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
udelay(100);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Backup registers */
|
||||
for (loop = 0; loop < UART_WA_SAVE_NR; loop++)
|
||||
uart_wa_regdata[loop] = readl(base + uart_wa_reg[loop]);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Disable UART so that FIFO data is flushed out */
|
||||
writew(0x00, uap->port.membase + UART011_CR);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Soft reset UART module */
|
||||
if (uap->port.dev->platform_data) {
|
||||
struct amba_pl011_data *plat;
|
||||
|
||||
plat = uap->port.dev->platform_data;
|
||||
if (plat->reset)
|
||||
plat->reset();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Restore registers */
|
||||
for (loop = 0; loop < UART_WA_SAVE_NR; loop++)
|
||||
writew(uart_wa_regdata[loop] ,
|
||||
uap->port.membase + uart_wa_reg[loop]);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Initialise the old status of the modem signals */
|
||||
uap->old_status = readw(uap->port.membase + UART01x_FR) &
|
||||
UART01x_FR_MODEM_ANY;
|
||||
|
||||
if (readl(base + UART011_MIS) & 0x2)
|
||||
printk(KERN_EMERG "UART_BT_WA: ***FAILED***\n");
|
||||
|
||||
/* Start Tx/Rx */
|
||||
tty->hw_stopped = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void pl011_stop_tx(struct uart_port *port)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct uart_amba_port *uap = (struct uart_amba_port *)port;
|
||||
@ -1245,12 +1161,26 @@ static irqreturn_t pl011_int(int irq, void *dev_id)
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
unsigned int status, pass_counter = AMBA_ISR_PASS_LIMIT;
|
||||
int handled = 0;
|
||||
unsigned int dummy_read;
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&uap->port.lock, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
status = readw(uap->port.membase + UART011_MIS);
|
||||
if (status) {
|
||||
do {
|
||||
if (uap->vendor->cts_event_workaround) {
|
||||
/* workaround to make sure that all bits are unlocked.. */
|
||||
writew(0x00, uap->port.membase + UART011_ICR);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* WA: introduce 26ns(1 uart clk) delay before W1C;
|
||||
* single apb access will incur 2 pclk(133.12Mhz) delay,
|
||||
* so add 2 dummy reads
|
||||
*/
|
||||
dummy_read = readw(uap->port.membase + UART011_ICR);
|
||||
dummy_read = readw(uap->port.membase + UART011_ICR);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
writew(status & ~(UART011_TXIS|UART011_RTIS|
|
||||
UART011_RXIS),
|
||||
uap->port.membase + UART011_ICR);
|
||||
@ -1267,11 +1197,8 @@ static irqreturn_t pl011_int(int irq, void *dev_id)
|
||||
if (status & UART011_TXIS)
|
||||
pl011_tx_chars(uap);
|
||||
|
||||
if (pass_counter-- == 0) {
|
||||
if (uap->interrupt_may_hang)
|
||||
tasklet_schedule(&pl011_lockup_tlet);
|
||||
if (pass_counter-- == 0)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
status = readw(uap->port.membase + UART011_MIS);
|
||||
} while (status != 0);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user