drm/i915: Avoid negative shift due to bigjoiner_pipes==0
bigjoiner_pipes==0 leads bigjoiner_master_pipe() to do BIT(ffs(0)-1) which is undefined behaviour. The code should actually still work fine since the only place we provoke that is intel_crtc_bigjoiner_slave_pipes() and it'll bitwise AND the result with 0, so doesn't really matter what we get out of bigjoiner_master_pipe(). But best not provoke undefined behaviour anyway. Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> Fixes: a6e7a006f5d5 ("drm/i915: Change bigjoiner state tracking to use the pipe bitmask") Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220223131315.18016-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com> (cherry picked from commit cccc71b552a1040ad3d738d7ec95570801fb0bf6) Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6de7e4f026
commit
4fe4ed07c8
@ -346,7 +346,10 @@ static enum pipe bigjoiner_master_pipe(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state
|
||||
|
||||
u8 intel_crtc_bigjoiner_slave_pipes(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return crtc_state->bigjoiner_pipes & ~BIT(bigjoiner_master_pipe(crtc_state));
|
||||
if (crtc_state->bigjoiner_pipes)
|
||||
return crtc_state->bigjoiner_pipes & ~BIT(bigjoiner_master_pipe(crtc_state));
|
||||
else
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bool intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user