drm/xe: don't allocate under ct->lock
Seems to be a sensitive lock, where ct->lock looks to be primed with fs_reclaim, so holding that and then allocating memory will cause lockdep to complain. We need to change the ordering wrt to grabbing the ct->lock and potentially grabbing the runtime_pm, since some of the runtime_pm routines can allocate memory (or at least that's what lockdep seems to suggest). Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a2f9f4ff07
commit
565ce72e1c
@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
#include "xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.h"
|
||||
|
||||
#include "xe_device.h"
|
||||
#include "xe_gt.h"
|
||||
#include "xe_guc.h"
|
||||
#include "xe_guc_ct.h"
|
||||
@ -112,6 +113,8 @@ static int send_tlb_invalidation(struct xe_guc *guc,
|
||||
* in order which they currently are, if that changes the algorithm will
|
||||
* need to be updated.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
xe_device_mem_access_get(gt->xe);
|
||||
mutex_lock(&guc->ct.lock);
|
||||
seqno = gt->tlb_invalidation.seqno;
|
||||
if (fence) {
|
||||
@ -140,6 +143,7 @@ static int send_tlb_invalidation(struct xe_guc *guc,
|
||||
if (ret < 0 && fence)
|
||||
invalidation_fence_signal(fence);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&guc->ct.lock);
|
||||
xe_device_mem_access_put(gt->xe);
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -498,26 +498,22 @@ static int __guc_ct_send_locked(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action,
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
xe_device_mem_access_get(ct_to_xe(ct));
|
||||
retry:
|
||||
ret = has_room(ct, len + GUC_CTB_HDR_LEN, g2h_len);
|
||||
if (unlikely(ret))
|
||||
goto put_wa;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = h2g_write(ct, action, len, g2h_fence ? g2h_fence->seqno : 0,
|
||||
!!g2h_fence);
|
||||
if (unlikely(ret)) {
|
||||
if (ret == -EAGAIN)
|
||||
goto retry;
|
||||
goto put_wa;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
g2h_reserve_space(ct, g2h_len, num_g2h);
|
||||
xe_guc_notify(ct_to_guc(ct));
|
||||
put_wa:
|
||||
xe_device_mem_access_put(ct_to_xe(ct));
|
||||
out:
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -539,6 +535,7 @@ static int guc_ct_send_locked(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action, u32 len,
|
||||
|
||||
XE_BUG_ON(g2h_len && g2h_fence);
|
||||
lockdep_assert_held(&ct->lock);
|
||||
xe_device_assert_mem_access(ct_to_xe(ct));
|
||||
|
||||
try_again:
|
||||
ret = __guc_ct_send_locked(ct, action, len, g2h_len, num_g2h,
|
||||
@ -608,10 +605,14 @@ static int guc_ct_send(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action, u32 len,
|
||||
|
||||
XE_BUG_ON(g2h_len && g2h_fence);
|
||||
|
||||
xe_device_mem_access_get(ct_to_xe(ct));
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&ct->lock);
|
||||
ret = guc_ct_send_locked(ct, action, len, g2h_len, num_g2h, g2h_fence);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&ct->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
xe_device_mem_access_put(ct_to_xe(ct));
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user