net/sctp: convert to ->poll_mask
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4df7338f6f
commit
568ea88ef9
@ -107,8 +107,7 @@ int sctp_backlog_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
|
||||
int sctp_inet_listen(struct socket *sock, int backlog);
|
||||
void sctp_write_space(struct sock *sk);
|
||||
void sctp_data_ready(struct sock *sk);
|
||||
__poll_t sctp_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
|
||||
poll_table *wait);
|
||||
__poll_t sctp_poll_mask(struct socket *sock, __poll_t events);
|
||||
void sctp_sock_rfree(struct sk_buff *skb);
|
||||
void sctp_copy_sock(struct sock *newsk, struct sock *sk,
|
||||
struct sctp_association *asoc);
|
||||
|
@ -1007,7 +1007,7 @@ static const struct proto_ops inet6_seqpacket_ops = {
|
||||
.socketpair = sock_no_socketpair,
|
||||
.accept = inet_accept,
|
||||
.getname = sctp_getname,
|
||||
.poll = sctp_poll,
|
||||
.poll_mask = sctp_poll_mask,
|
||||
.ioctl = inet6_ioctl,
|
||||
.listen = sctp_inet_listen,
|
||||
.shutdown = inet_shutdown,
|
||||
|
@ -1016,7 +1016,7 @@ static const struct proto_ops inet_seqpacket_ops = {
|
||||
.socketpair = sock_no_socketpair,
|
||||
.accept = inet_accept,
|
||||
.getname = inet_getname, /* Semantics are different. */
|
||||
.poll = sctp_poll,
|
||||
.poll_mask = sctp_poll_mask,
|
||||
.ioctl = inet_ioctl,
|
||||
.listen = sctp_inet_listen,
|
||||
.shutdown = inet_shutdown, /* Looks harmless. */
|
||||
|
@ -7701,14 +7701,12 @@ out:
|
||||
* here, again, by modeling the current TCP/UDP code. We don't have
|
||||
* a good way to test with it yet.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
__poll_t sctp_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock, poll_table *wait)
|
||||
__poll_t sctp_poll_mask(struct socket *sock, __poll_t events)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
|
||||
struct sctp_sock *sp = sctp_sk(sk);
|
||||
__poll_t mask;
|
||||
|
||||
poll_wait(file, sk_sleep(sk), wait);
|
||||
|
||||
sock_rps_record_flow(sk);
|
||||
|
||||
/* A TCP-style listening socket becomes readable when the accept queue
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user