drm/mst: Fix NULL pointer dereference at drm_dp_add_payload_part2
[Why] Commit: - commit 5aa1dfcdf0a4 ("drm/mst: Refactor the flow for payload allocation/removement") accidently overwrite the commit - commit 54d217406afe ("drm: use mgr->dev in drm_dbg_kms in drm_dp_add_payload_part2") which cause regression. [How] Recover the original NULL fix and remove the unnecessary input parameter 'state' for drm_dp_add_payload_part2(). Fixes: 5aa1dfcdf0a4 ("drm/mst: Refactor the flow for payload allocation/removement") Reported-by: Leon Weiß <leon.weiss@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/38c253ea42072cc825dc969ac4e6b9b600371cc8.camel@ruhr-uni-bochum.de/ Cc: lyude@redhat.com Cc: imre.deak@intel.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: regressions@lists.linux.dev Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240307062957.2323620-1-Wayne.Lin@amd.com (cherry picked from commit 4545614c1d8da603e57b60dd66224d81b6ffc305)
This commit is contained in:
parent
20da948e3a
commit
5a507b7d2b
@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ void dm_helpers_dp_mst_send_payload_allocation(
|
||||
mst_state = to_drm_dp_mst_topology_state(mst_mgr->base.state);
|
||||
new_payload = drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(mst_state, aconnector->mst_output_port);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = drm_dp_add_payload_part2(mst_mgr, mst_state->base.state, new_payload);
|
||||
ret = drm_dp_add_payload_part2(mst_mgr, new_payload);
|
||||
|
||||
if (ret) {
|
||||
amdgpu_dm_set_mst_status(&aconnector->mst_status,
|
||||
|
@ -3421,7 +3421,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_remove_payload_part2);
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* drm_dp_add_payload_part2() - Execute payload update part 2
|
||||
* @mgr: Manager to use.
|
||||
* @state: The global atomic state
|
||||
* @payload: The payload to update
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If @payload was successfully assigned a starting time slot by drm_dp_add_payload_part1(), this
|
||||
@ -3430,14 +3429,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_remove_payload_part2);
|
||||
* Returns: 0 on success, negative error code on failure.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int drm_dp_add_payload_part2(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
|
||||
struct drm_atomic_state *state,
|
||||
struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Skip failed payloads */
|
||||
if (payload->payload_allocation_status != DRM_DP_MST_PAYLOAD_ALLOCATION_DFP) {
|
||||
drm_dbg_kms(state->dev, "Part 1 of payload creation for %s failed, skipping part 2\n",
|
||||
drm_dbg_kms(mgr->dev, "Part 1 of payload creation for %s failed, skipping part 2\n",
|
||||
payload->port->connector->name);
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1241,7 +1241,7 @@ static void intel_mst_enable_dp(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
|
||||
if (first_mst_stream)
|
||||
intel_ddi_wait_for_fec_status(encoder, pipe_config, true);
|
||||
|
||||
drm_dp_add_payload_part2(&intel_dp->mst_mgr, &state->base,
|
||||
drm_dp_add_payload_part2(&intel_dp->mst_mgr,
|
||||
drm_atomic_get_mst_payload_state(mst_state, connector->port));
|
||||
|
||||
if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) >= 12)
|
||||
|
@ -915,7 +915,7 @@ nv50_msto_cleanup(struct drm_atomic_state *state,
|
||||
msto->disabled = false;
|
||||
drm_dp_remove_payload_part2(mgr, new_mst_state, old_payload, new_payload);
|
||||
} else if (msto->enabled) {
|
||||
drm_dp_add_payload_part2(mgr, state, new_payload);
|
||||
drm_dp_add_payload_part2(mgr, new_payload);
|
||||
msto->enabled = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -871,7 +871,6 @@ int drm_dp_add_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
|
||||
struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *mst_state,
|
||||
struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload);
|
||||
int drm_dp_add_payload_part2(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
|
||||
struct drm_atomic_state *state,
|
||||
struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *payload);
|
||||
void drm_dp_remove_payload_part1(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
|
||||
struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *mst_state,
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user