iv/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

mm/memcg: fix obsolete function name in mem_cgroup_protection()

Browse Source 
Commit 45c7f7e1ef17 ("mm, memcg: decouple e{low,min} state mutations from
protection checks") changed the function name but not the corresponding
comment.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230727115934.657787-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Miaohe Lin 2023-07-27 19:59:34 +08:00 committed by Andrew Morton
parent 98804a944a
commit 5d241789df
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
include/linux/memcontrol.h
View File

@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ static inline void mem_cgroup_protection(struct mem_cgroup *root,
/*
* There is no reclaim protection applied to a targeted reclaim.
* We are special casing this specific case here because
* mem_cgroup_protected calculation is not robust enough to keep
* mem_cgroup_calculate_protection is not robust enough to keep
* the protection invariant for calculated effective values for
* parallel reclaimers with different reclaim target. This is
* especially a problem for tail memcgs (as they have pages on LRU)