drm/i915/uc: Don't enable communication twice on resume
When coming out of S3/S4 we sanitize and re-init the HW, which includes enabling communication during uc_init_hw. We therefore don't want to do that again in uc_resume and can just tell GuC to reload its state. v2: split uc_resume and uc_runtime_resume to match the suspend functions and to better differentiate the expected state in the 2 scenarios (Chris) Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190730230743.19542-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
f277bc0c98
commit
602776f96b
@ -233,11 +233,18 @@ static void guc_disable_interrupts(struct intel_guc *guc)
|
||||
guc->interrupts.disable(guc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline bool guc_communication_enabled(struct intel_guc *guc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return guc->send != intel_guc_send_nop;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int guc_enable_communication(struct intel_guc *guc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = guc_to_gt(guc)->i915;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
GEM_BUG_ON(guc_communication_enabled(guc));
|
||||
|
||||
ret = intel_guc_ct_enable(&guc->ct);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
@ -550,7 +557,7 @@ void intel_uc_suspend(struct intel_uc *uc)
|
||||
intel_uc_runtime_suspend(uc);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int intel_uc_resume(struct intel_uc *uc)
|
||||
static int __uc_resume(struct intel_uc *uc, bool enable_communication)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct intel_guc *guc = &uc->guc;
|
||||
int err;
|
||||
@ -558,7 +565,11 @@ int intel_uc_resume(struct intel_uc *uc)
|
||||
if (!intel_guc_is_running(guc))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
guc_enable_communication(guc);
|
||||
/* Make sure we enable communication if and only if it's disabled */
|
||||
GEM_BUG_ON(enable_communication == guc_communication_enabled(guc));
|
||||
|
||||
if (enable_communication)
|
||||
guc_enable_communication(guc);
|
||||
|
||||
err = intel_guc_resume(guc);
|
||||
if (err) {
|
||||
@ -568,3 +579,21 @@ int intel_uc_resume(struct intel_uc *uc)
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int intel_uc_resume(struct intel_uc *uc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* When coming out of S3/S4 we sanitize and re-init the HW, so
|
||||
* communication is already re-enabled at this point.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
return __uc_resume(uc, false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int intel_uc_runtime_resume(struct intel_uc *uc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* During runtime resume we don't sanitize, so we need to re-init
|
||||
* communication as well.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
return __uc_resume(uc, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ void intel_uc_reset_prepare(struct intel_uc *uc);
|
||||
void intel_uc_suspend(struct intel_uc *uc);
|
||||
void intel_uc_runtime_suspend(struct intel_uc *uc);
|
||||
int intel_uc_resume(struct intel_uc *uc);
|
||||
int intel_uc_runtime_resume(struct intel_uc *uc);
|
||||
|
||||
static inline bool intel_uc_is_using_guc(struct intel_uc *uc)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -2950,7 +2950,7 @@ static int intel_runtime_suspend(struct device *kdev)
|
||||
|
||||
intel_runtime_pm_enable_interrupts(dev_priv);
|
||||
|
||||
intel_uc_resume(&dev_priv->gt.uc);
|
||||
intel_uc_runtime_resume(&dev_priv->gt.uc);
|
||||
|
||||
intel_gt_init_swizzling(&dev_priv->gt);
|
||||
i915_gem_restore_fences(dev_priv);
|
||||
@ -3047,7 +3047,7 @@ static int intel_runtime_resume(struct device *kdev)
|
||||
|
||||
intel_runtime_pm_enable_interrupts(dev_priv);
|
||||
|
||||
intel_uc_resume(&dev_priv->gt.uc);
|
||||
intel_uc_runtime_resume(&dev_priv->gt.uc);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* No point of rolling back things in case of an error, as the best
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user