Merge branch 'locking-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull locking fixes from Ingo Molnar: "Two lockdep fixes for bugs introduced by the cross-release dependency tracking feature - plus a commit that disables it because performance regressed in an absymal fashion on some systems" * 'locking-urgent-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: locking/lockdep: Disable cross-release features for now locking/selftest: Avoid false BUG report locking/lockdep: Fix stacktrace mess
This commit is contained in:
commit
60a6ca6c94
@ -1873,10 +1873,10 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
|
||||
struct held_lock *next, int distance, struct stack_trace *trace,
|
||||
int (*save)(struct stack_trace *trace))
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct lock_list *entry;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
struct lock_list this;
|
||||
struct lock_list *uninitialized_var(target_entry);
|
||||
struct lock_list *entry;
|
||||
struct lock_list this;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Prove that the new <prev> -> <next> dependency would not
|
||||
@ -1890,8 +1890,17 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
|
||||
this.class = hlock_class(next);
|
||||
this.parent = NULL;
|
||||
ret = check_noncircular(&this, hlock_class(prev), &target_entry);
|
||||
if (unlikely(!ret))
|
||||
if (unlikely(!ret)) {
|
||||
if (!trace->entries) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If @save fails here, the printing might trigger
|
||||
* a WARN but because of the !nr_entries it should
|
||||
* not do bad things.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
save(trace);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return print_circular_bug(&this, target_entry, next, prev, trace);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (unlikely(ret < 0))
|
||||
return print_bfs_bug(ret);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1938,7 +1947,7 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
|
||||
return print_bfs_bug(ret);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
if (save && !save(trace))
|
||||
if (!trace->entries && !save(trace))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -1958,20 +1967,6 @@ check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
|
||||
if (!ret)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Debugging printouts:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (verbose(hlock_class(prev)) || verbose(hlock_class(next))) {
|
||||
graph_unlock();
|
||||
printk("\n new dependency: ");
|
||||
print_lock_name(hlock_class(prev));
|
||||
printk(KERN_CONT " => ");
|
||||
print_lock_name(hlock_class(next));
|
||||
printk(KERN_CONT "\n");
|
||||
dump_stack();
|
||||
if (!graph_lock())
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 2;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1986,8 +1981,12 @@ check_prevs_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int depth = curr->lockdep_depth;
|
||||
struct held_lock *hlock;
|
||||
struct stack_trace trace;
|
||||
int (*save)(struct stack_trace *trace) = save_trace;
|
||||
struct stack_trace trace = {
|
||||
.nr_entries = 0,
|
||||
.max_entries = 0,
|
||||
.entries = NULL,
|
||||
.skip = 0,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Debugging checks.
|
||||
@ -2018,17 +2017,10 @@ check_prevs_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (hlock->read != 2 && hlock->check) {
|
||||
int ret = check_prev_add(curr, hlock, next,
|
||||
distance, &trace, save);
|
||||
distance, &trace, save_trace);
|
||||
if (!ret)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Stop saving stack_trace if save_trace() was
|
||||
* called at least once:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (save && ret == 2)
|
||||
save = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Stop after the first non-trylock entry,
|
||||
* as non-trylock entries have added their
|
||||
|
@ -1092,8 +1092,8 @@ config PROVE_LOCKING
|
||||
select DEBUG_MUTEXES
|
||||
select DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES if RT_MUTEXES
|
||||
select DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
|
||||
select LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE
|
||||
select LOCKDEP_COMPLETIONS
|
||||
select LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE if BROKEN
|
||||
select LOCKDEP_COMPLETIONS if BROKEN
|
||||
select TRACE_IRQFLAGS
|
||||
default n
|
||||
help
|
||||
|
@ -2031,11 +2031,13 @@ void locking_selftest(void)
|
||||
print_testname("mixed read-lock/lock-write ABBA");
|
||||
pr_cont(" |");
|
||||
dotest(rlock_ABBA1, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_RWLOCK);
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Lockdep does indeed fail here, but there's nothing we can do about
|
||||
* that now. Don't kill lockdep for it.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
unexpected_testcase_failures--;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
pr_cont(" |");
|
||||
dotest(rwsem_ABBA1, FAILURE, LOCKTYPE_RWSEM);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user