bonding: alb: remove curr_slave_lock
First in rlb_teach_disabled_mac_on_primary() it's okay to remove curr_slave_lock as all callers except bond_alb_monitor() already hold RTNL, and in case bond_alb_monitor() is executing we can at most have a period with bad throughput (very unlikely though). In bond_alb_monitor() it's okay to remove the read_lock as the slave list is walked with RCU and the worst that could happen is another transmitter at the same time and thus for a period which currently is 10 seconds (bond_alb.h: BOND_ALB_LP_TICKS). And bond_alb_handle_active_change() is okay because it's always called with RTNL. Removed the ASSERT_RTNL() because it'll be inserted in the parent function in a following patch. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
86e749866d
commit
62c5f51853
@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ static struct slave *__rlb_next_rx_slave(struct bonding *bond)
|
||||
/* teach the switch the mac of a disabled slave
|
||||
* on the primary for fault tolerance
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Caller must hold bond->curr_slave_lock for write or bond lock for write
|
||||
* Caller must hold RTNL
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void rlb_teach_disabled_mac_on_primary(struct bonding *bond, u8 addr[])
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -512,12 +512,8 @@ static void rlb_clear_slave(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *slave)
|
||||
|
||||
_unlock_rx_hashtbl_bh(bond);
|
||||
|
||||
write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (slave != bond_deref_active_protected(bond))
|
||||
rlb_teach_disabled_mac_on_primary(bond, slave->dev->dev_addr);
|
||||
|
||||
write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void rlb_update_client(struct rlb_client_info *client_info)
|
||||
@ -1595,13 +1591,6 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
|
||||
if (bond_info->lp_counter >= BOND_ALB_LP_TICKS(bond)) {
|
||||
bool strict_match;
|
||||
|
||||
/* change of curr_active_slave involves swapping of mac addresses.
|
||||
* in order to avoid this swapping from happening while
|
||||
* sending the learning packets, the curr_slave_lock must be held for
|
||||
* read.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
read_lock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, slave, iter) {
|
||||
/* If updating current_active, use all currently
|
||||
* user mac addreses (!strict_match). Otherwise, only
|
||||
@ -1613,17 +1602,11 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
|
||||
alb_send_learning_packets(slave, slave->dev->dev_addr,
|
||||
strict_match);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
read_unlock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
bond_info->lp_counter = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* rebalance tx traffic */
|
||||
if (bond_info->tx_rebalance_counter >= BOND_TLB_REBALANCE_TICKS) {
|
||||
|
||||
read_lock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, slave, iter) {
|
||||
tlb_clear_slave(bond, slave, 1);
|
||||
if (slave == rcu_access_pointer(bond->curr_active_slave)) {
|
||||
@ -1633,9 +1616,6 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
|
||||
bond_info->unbalanced_load = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
read_unlock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
bond_info->tx_rebalance_counter = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1775,21 +1755,14 @@ void bond_alb_handle_link_change(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *slave, char
|
||||
* Set the bond->curr_active_slave to @new_slave and handle
|
||||
* mac address swapping and promiscuity changes as needed.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If new_slave is NULL, caller must hold curr_slave_lock for write
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If new_slave is not NULL, caller must hold RTNL, curr_slave_lock
|
||||
* for write. Processing here may sleep, so no other locks may be held.
|
||||
* Caller must hold RTNL
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void bond_alb_handle_active_change(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *new_slave)
|
||||
__releases(&bond->curr_slave_lock)
|
||||
__acquires(&bond->curr_slave_lock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct slave *swap_slave;
|
||||
struct slave *curr_active;
|
||||
|
||||
curr_active = rcu_dereference_protected(bond->curr_active_slave,
|
||||
!new_slave ||
|
||||
lockdep_is_held(&bond->curr_slave_lock));
|
||||
curr_active = rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
|
||||
if (curr_active == new_slave)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1820,10 +1793,6 @@ void bond_alb_handle_active_change(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *new_slave
|
||||
tlb_clear_slave(bond, swap_slave, 1);
|
||||
tlb_clear_slave(bond, new_slave, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
ASSERT_RTNL();
|
||||
|
||||
/* in TLB mode, the slave might flip down/up with the old dev_addr,
|
||||
* and thus filter bond->dev_addr's packets, so force bond's mac
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -1852,8 +1821,6 @@ void bond_alb_handle_active_change(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *new_slave
|
||||
alb_send_learning_packets(new_slave, bond->dev->dev_addr,
|
||||
false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Called with RTNL */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user