iv/linux
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[PARISC] Enable interrupts while spinning

Browse Source 
Use the __raw_spin_lock_flags routine so we can take an interrupt while
spinning.  This re-fixes a bug jejb found on 2005-10-20:

CPU0 does a flush_tlb_all holding the vmlist_lock for write.
CPU1 tries a cat of /proc/meminfo which tries to acquire vmlist_lock for read
CPU1 is now spinning with interrupts disabled
CPU0 tries to execute a smp_call_function to flush the local tlb caches
This is now a deadlock because CPU1 is spinning with interrupts disabled and
can never receive the IPI

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@parisc-linux.org>
This commit is contained in:
Matthew Wilcox 2006-09-08 05:43:44 -06:00 committed by Matthew Wilcox
parent 56f335c89e
commit 65ee8f0a7f
1 changed files with 21 additions and 10 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

31
include/asm-parisc/spinlock.h
View File

@ -57,35 +57,42 @@ static inline int __raw_spin_trylock(raw_spinlock_t *x)
/*
* Read-write spinlocks, allowing multiple readers but only one writer.
* The spinlock is held by the writer, preventing any readers or other
* writers from grabbing the rwlock. Readers use the lock to serialise their
* access to the counter (which records how many readers currently hold the
* lock). Linux rwlocks are unfair to writers; they can be starved for
* an indefinite time by readers. They can also be taken in interrupt context,
* so we have to disable interrupts when acquiring the spin lock to be sure
* that an interrupting reader doesn't get an inconsistent view of the lock.
* Linux rwlocks are unfair to writers; they can be starved for an indefinite
* time by readers. With care, they can also be taken in interrupt context.
*
* In the PA-RISC implementation, we have a spinlock and a counter.
* Readers use the lock to serialise their access to the counter (which
* records how many readers currently hold the lock).
* Writers hold the spinlock, preventing any readers or other writers from
* grabbing the rwlock.
*/
/* Note that we have to ensure interrupts are disabled in case we're
* interrupted by some other code that wants to grab the same read lock */
static __inline__ void __raw_read_lock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
{
unsigned long flags;
local_irq_save(flags);
__raw_spin_lock(&rw->lock);
__raw_spin_lock_flags(&rw->lock, flags);
rw->counter++;
__raw_spin_unlock(&rw->lock);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
/* Note that we have to ensure interrupts are disabled in case we're
* interrupted by some other code that wants to grab the same read lock */
static __inline__ void __raw_read_unlock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
{
unsigned long flags;
local_irq_save(flags);
__raw_spin_lock(&rw->lock);
__raw_spin_lock_flags(&rw->lock, flags);
rw->counter--;
__raw_spin_unlock(&rw->lock);
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
/* Note that we have to ensure interrupts are disabled in case we're
* interrupted by some other code that wants to grab the same read lock */
static __inline__ int __raw_read_trylock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
{
unsigned long flags;
@ -110,12 +117,14 @@ static __inline__ int __raw_read_trylock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
goto retry;
}
/* Note that we have to ensure interrupts are disabled in case we're
* interrupted by some other code that wants to read_trylock() this lock */
static __inline__ void __raw_write_lock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
{
unsigned long flags;
retry:
local_irq_save(flags);
__raw_spin_lock(&rw->lock);
__raw_spin_lock_flags(&rw->lock, flags);
if (rw->counter != 0) {
__raw_spin_unlock(&rw->lock);
@ -138,6 +147,8 @@ static __inline__ void __raw_write_unlock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
__raw_spin_unlock(&rw->lock);
}
/* Note that we have to ensure interrupts are disabled in case we're
* interrupted by some other code that wants to read_trylock() this lock */
static __inline__ int __raw_write_trylock(raw_rwlock_t *rw)
{
unsigned long flags;