perf intel-pt: Prefer get_unaligned_le64 to memcpy_le64
Use get_unaligned_le64() instead of memcpy_le64(..., 8) because it produces simpler code. Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231005190451.175568-6-adrian.hunter@intel.com Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3b4fa67fc6
commit
661ce78105
@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static int intel_pt_get_mnt(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
|
||||
if (len < 11)
|
||||
return INTEL_PT_NEED_MORE_BYTES;
|
||||
packet->type = INTEL_PT_MNT;
|
||||
memcpy_le64(&packet->payload, buf + 3, 8);
|
||||
packet->payload = get_unaligned_le64(buf + 3);
|
||||
return 11;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ static int intel_pt_get_bip_8(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
|
||||
return INTEL_PT_NEED_MORE_BYTES;
|
||||
packet->type = INTEL_PT_BIP;
|
||||
packet->count = buf[0] >> 3;
|
||||
memcpy_le64(&packet->payload, buf + 1, 8);
|
||||
packet->payload = get_unaligned_le64(buf + 1);
|
||||
return 9;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ static int intel_pt_get_evd(const unsigned char *buf, size_t len,
|
||||
packet->type = INTEL_PT_EVD;
|
||||
packet->count = buf[2] & 0x3f;
|
||||
packet->payload = buf[3];
|
||||
memcpy_le64(&packet->payload, buf + 3, 8);
|
||||
packet->payload = get_unaligned_le64(buf + 3);
|
||||
return 11;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user