NFS: remove incorrect "Lock reclaim failed!" warning.
After reclaiming state that was lost, the NFS client tries to reclaim any locks, and then checks that each one has NFS_LOCK_INITIALIZED set (which means that the server has confirmed the lock). However if the client holds a delegation, nfs_reclaim_locks() simply aborts (or more accurately it called nfs_lock_reclaim() and that returns without doing anything). This is because when a delegation is held, the server doesn't need to know about locks. So if a delegation is held, NFS_LOCK_INITIALIZED is not expected, and its absence is certainly not an error. So don't print the warnings if NFS_DELGATED_STATE is set. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
08cb47faa4
commit
6686390bab
@ -1415,14 +1415,16 @@ restart:
|
|||||||
if (status >= 0) {
|
if (status >= 0) {
|
||||||
status = nfs4_reclaim_locks(state, ops);
|
status = nfs4_reclaim_locks(state, ops);
|
||||||
if (status >= 0) {
|
if (status >= 0) {
|
||||||
spin_lock(&state->state_lock);
|
if (test_bit(NFS_DELEGATED_STATE, &state->flags) != 0) {
|
||||||
list_for_each_entry(lock, &state->lock_states, ls_locks) {
|
spin_lock(&state->state_lock);
|
||||||
if (!test_bit(NFS_LOCK_INITIALIZED, &lock->ls_flags))
|
list_for_each_entry(lock, &state->lock_states, ls_locks) {
|
||||||
pr_warn_ratelimited("NFS: "
|
if (!test_bit(NFS_LOCK_INITIALIZED, &lock->ls_flags))
|
||||||
"%s: Lock reclaim "
|
pr_warn_ratelimited("NFS: "
|
||||||
"failed!\n", __func__);
|
"%s: Lock reclaim "
|
||||||
|
"failed!\n", __func__);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
spin_unlock(&state->state_lock);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
spin_unlock(&state->state_lock);
|
|
||||||
nfs4_put_open_state(state);
|
nfs4_put_open_state(state);
|
||||||
spin_lock(&sp->so_lock);
|
spin_lock(&sp->so_lock);
|
||||||
goto restart;
|
goto restart;
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user