[TCP] FRTO: Fake cwnd for ssthresh callback
TCP without FRTO would be in Loss state with small cwnd. FRTO, however, leaves cwnd (typically) to a larger value which causes ssthresh to become too large in case RTO is triggered again compared to what conventional recovery would do. Because consecutive RTOs result in only a single ssthresh reduction, RTO+cumulative ACK+RTO pattern is required to trigger this event. A large comment is included for congestion control module writers trying to figure out what CA_EVENT_FRTO handler should do because there exists a remote possibility of incompatibility between FRTO and module defined ssthresh functions. Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d1a54c6a0a
commit
66e93e45c0
@ -1289,7 +1289,31 @@ void tcp_enter_frto(struct sock *sk)
|
||||
((icsk->icsk_ca_state == TCP_CA_Loss || tp->frto_counter) &&
|
||||
!icsk->icsk_retransmits)) {
|
||||
tp->prior_ssthresh = tcp_current_ssthresh(sk);
|
||||
tp->snd_ssthresh = icsk->icsk_ca_ops->ssthresh(sk);
|
||||
/* Our state is too optimistic in ssthresh() call because cwnd
|
||||
* is not reduced until tcp_enter_frto_loss() when previous FRTO
|
||||
* recovery has not yet completed. Pattern would be this: RTO,
|
||||
* Cumulative ACK, RTO (2xRTO for the same segment does not end
|
||||
* up here twice).
|
||||
* RFC4138 should be more specific on what to do, even though
|
||||
* RTO is quite unlikely to occur after the first Cumulative ACK
|
||||
* due to back-off and complexity of triggering events ...
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (tp->frto_counter) {
|
||||
u32 stored_cwnd;
|
||||
stored_cwnd = tp->snd_cwnd;
|
||||
tp->snd_cwnd = 2;
|
||||
tp->snd_ssthresh = icsk->icsk_ca_ops->ssthresh(sk);
|
||||
tp->snd_cwnd = stored_cwnd;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
tp->snd_ssthresh = icsk->icsk_ca_ops->ssthresh(sk);
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* ... in theory, cong.control module could do "any tricks" in
|
||||
* ssthresh(), which means that ca_state, lost bits and lost_out
|
||||
* counter would have to be faked before the call occurs. We
|
||||
* consider that too expensive, unlikely and hacky, so modules
|
||||
* using these in ssthresh() must deal these incompatibility
|
||||
* issues if they receives CA_EVENT_FRTO and frto_counter != 0
|
||||
*/
|
||||
tcp_ca_event(sk, CA_EVENT_FRTO);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user