thermal: intel_powerclamp: Use get_cpu() instead of smp_processor_id() to avoid crash
When CPU 0 is offline and intel_powerclamp is used to inject idle, it generates kernel BUG: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: bash/15687 caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20 CPU: 4 PID: 15687 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.19.0-rc7+ #57 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x63 dump_stack+0x10/0x16 check_preemption_disabled+0xdd/0xe0 debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20 powerclamp_set_cur_state+0x7f/0xf9 [intel_powerclamp] ... ... Here CPU 0 is the control CPU by default and changed to the current CPU, if CPU 0 offlined. This check has to be performed under cpus_read_lock(), hence the above warning. Use get_cpu() instead of smp_processor_id() to avoid this BUG. Suggested-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> [ rjw: Subject edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e9a7c526c2
commit
68b99e94a4
@ -532,8 +532,10 @@ static int start_power_clamp(void)
|
||||
|
||||
/* prefer BSP */
|
||||
control_cpu = 0;
|
||||
if (!cpu_online(control_cpu))
|
||||
control_cpu = smp_processor_id();
|
||||
if (!cpu_online(control_cpu)) {
|
||||
control_cpu = get_cpu();
|
||||
put_cpu();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
clamping = true;
|
||||
schedule_delayed_work(&poll_pkg_cstate_work, 0);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user