pwm: meson: modify and simplify calculation in meson_pwm_get_state
I don't see a reason why we should treat the case lo < hi differently and return 0 as period and duty_cycle. The current logic was added withc375bcbaab
("pwm: meson: Read the full hardware state in meson_pwm_get_state()"), Martin as original author doesn't remember why it was implemented this way back then. So let's handle it as normal use case and also remove the optimization for lo == 0. I think the improved readability is worth it. Fixes:c375bcbaab
("pwm: meson: Read the full hardware state in meson_pwm_get_state()") Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Rokosov <ddrokosov@sberdevices.ru> Acked-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5442c33f21
commit
6b9352f3f8
@ -351,18 +351,8 @@ static int meson_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
|
||||
channel->lo = FIELD_GET(PWM_LOW_MASK, value);
|
||||
channel->hi = FIELD_GET(PWM_HIGH_MASK, value);
|
||||
|
||||
if (channel->lo == 0) {
|
||||
state->period = meson_pwm_cnt_to_ns(chip, pwm, channel->hi);
|
||||
state->duty_cycle = state->period;
|
||||
} else if (channel->lo >= channel->hi) {
|
||||
state->period = meson_pwm_cnt_to_ns(chip, pwm,
|
||||
channel->lo + channel->hi);
|
||||
state->duty_cycle = meson_pwm_cnt_to_ns(chip, pwm,
|
||||
channel->hi);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
state->period = 0;
|
||||
state->duty_cycle = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
state->period = meson_pwm_cnt_to_ns(chip, pwm, channel->lo + channel->hi);
|
||||
state->duty_cycle = meson_pwm_cnt_to_ns(chip, pwm, channel->hi);
|
||||
|
||||
state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user