Btrfs: Fix async thread shutdown race
It was possible for an async worker thread to be selected to receive a new work item, but exit before the work item was actually placed into that thread's work list. This commit fixes the race by incrementing the num_pending counter earlier, and making sure to check the number of pending work items before a thread exits. Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
627e421a3f
commit
6e74057c46
@ -191,7 +191,8 @@ static int try_worker_shutdown(struct btrfs_worker_thread *worker)
|
||||
!worker->working &&
|
||||
!list_empty(&worker->worker_list) &&
|
||||
list_empty(&worker->prio_pending) &&
|
||||
list_empty(&worker->pending)) {
|
||||
list_empty(&worker->pending) &&
|
||||
atomic_read(&worker->num_pending) == 0) {
|
||||
freeit = 1;
|
||||
list_del_init(&worker->worker_list);
|
||||
worker->workers->num_workers--;
|
||||
@ -485,7 +486,6 @@ static struct btrfs_worker_thread *next_worker(struct btrfs_workers *workers)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
next = workers->worker_list.next;
|
||||
worker = list_entry(next, struct btrfs_worker_thread, worker_list);
|
||||
atomic_inc(&worker->num_pending);
|
||||
worker->sequence++;
|
||||
|
||||
if (worker->sequence % workers->idle_thresh == 0)
|
||||
@ -521,8 +521,7 @@ again:
|
||||
goto again;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&workers->lock, flags);
|
||||
return worker;
|
||||
goto found;
|
||||
|
||||
fallback:
|
||||
fallback = NULL;
|
||||
@ -537,6 +536,12 @@ fallback:
|
||||
BUG_ON(!fallback);
|
||||
worker = list_entry(fallback,
|
||||
struct btrfs_worker_thread, worker_list);
|
||||
found:
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* this makes sure the worker doesn't exit before it is placed
|
||||
* onto a busy/idle list
|
||||
*/
|
||||
atomic_inc(&worker->num_pending);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&workers->lock, flags);
|
||||
return worker;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -569,7 +574,7 @@ int btrfs_requeue_work(struct btrfs_work *work)
|
||||
spin_lock(&worker->workers->lock);
|
||||
worker->idle = 0;
|
||||
list_move_tail(&worker->worker_list,
|
||||
&worker->workers->worker_list);
|
||||
&worker->workers->worker_list);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&worker->workers->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!worker->working) {
|
||||
@ -627,7 +632,6 @@ int btrfs_queue_worker(struct btrfs_workers *workers, struct btrfs_work *work)
|
||||
list_add_tail(&work->list, &worker->prio_pending);
|
||||
else
|
||||
list_add_tail(&work->list, &worker->pending);
|
||||
atomic_inc(&worker->num_pending);
|
||||
check_busy_worker(worker);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user