From e67ddd9b1cff7872d43ead73a1403c4e532003d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Maxim Mikityanskiy Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 19:52:32 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/6] bpf: Track spilled unbounded scalars Support the pattern where an unbounded scalar is spilled to the stack, then boundary checks are performed on the src register, after which the stack frame slot is refilled into a register. Before this commit, the verifier didn't treat the src register and the stack slot as related if the src register was an unbounded scalar. The register state wasn't copied, the id wasn't preserved, and the stack slot was marked as STACK_MISC. Subsequent boundary checks on the src register wouldn't result in updating the boundaries of the spilled variable on the stack. After this commit, the verifier will preserve the bond between src and dst even if src is unbounded, which permits to do boundary checks on src and refill dst later, still remembering its boundaries. Such a pattern is sometimes generated by clang when compiling complex long functions. One test is adjusted to reflect that now unbounded scalars are tracked. Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240127175237.526726-2-maxtram95@gmail.com --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 16 +--------------- .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spill_fill.c | 6 +++--- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index cd4d780e5400..28f62f24da7e 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -4380,20 +4380,6 @@ static u64 reg_const_value(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, bool subreg32) return subreg32 ? tnum_subreg(reg->var_off).value : reg->var_off.value; } -static bool __is_scalar_unbounded(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) -{ - return tnum_is_unknown(reg->var_off) && - reg->smin_value == S64_MIN && reg->smax_value == S64_MAX && - reg->umin_value == 0 && reg->umax_value == U64_MAX && - reg->s32_min_value == S32_MIN && reg->s32_max_value == S32_MAX && - reg->u32_min_value == 0 && reg->u32_max_value == U32_MAX; -} - -static bool register_is_bounded(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) -{ - return reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE && !__is_scalar_unbounded(reg); -} - static bool __is_pointer_value(bool allow_ptr_leaks, const struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { @@ -4504,7 +4490,7 @@ static int check_stack_write_fixed_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, return err; mark_stack_slot_scratched(env, spi); - if (reg && !(off % BPF_REG_SIZE) && register_is_bounded(reg) && env->bpf_capable) { + if (reg && !(off % BPF_REG_SIZE) && reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE && env->bpf_capable) { bool reg_value_fits; reg_value_fits = get_reg_width(reg) <= BITS_PER_BYTE * size; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spill_fill.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spill_fill.c index 7013a9694163..317806451762 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spill_fill.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spill_fill.c @@ -452,9 +452,9 @@ l0_%=: r1 >>= 16; \ SEC("raw_tp") __log_level(2) __success -__msg("fp-8=0m??mmmm") -__msg("fp-16=00mm??mm") -__msg("fp-24=00mm???m") +__msg("fp-8=0m??scalar()") +__msg("fp-16=00mm??scalar()") +__msg("fp-24=00mm???scalar()") __naked void spill_subregs_preserve_stack_zero(void) { asm volatile ( From 6be503cec6c9bccd64f72c03697011d2e2b96fc3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Maxim Mikityanskiy Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 19:52:33 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/6] selftests/bpf: Test tracking spilled unbounded scalars The previous commit added tracking for unbounded scalars on spill. Add the test case to check the new functionality. Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240127175237.526726-3-maxtram95@gmail.com --- .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spill_fill.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spill_fill.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spill_fill.c index 317806451762..f9803005e1c0 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spill_fill.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spill_fill.c @@ -940,4 +940,31 @@ l0_%=: r0 = 0; \ : __clobber_all); } +SEC("xdp") +__description("spill unbounded reg, then range check src") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void spill_unbounded(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + /* Produce an unbounded scalar. */ \ + call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32]; \ + /* Spill r0 to stack. */ \ + *(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r0; \ + /* Boundary check on r0. */ \ + if r0 > 16 goto l0_%=; \ + /* Fill r0 from stack. */ \ + r0 = *(u64*)(r10 - 8); \ + /* Boundary check on r0 with predetermined result. */\ + if r0 <= 16 goto l0_%=; \ + /* Dead branch: the verifier should prune it. Do an invalid memory\ + * access if the verifier follows it. \ + */ \ + r0 = *(u64*)(r9 + 0); \ +l0_%=: r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32) + : __clobber_all); +} + char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; From c1e6148cb4f83cec841db1f066e8db4a86c1f118 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Maxim Mikityanskiy Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 19:52:34 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 3/6] bpf: Preserve boundaries and track scalars on narrowing fill When the width of a fill is smaller than the width of the preceding spill, the information about scalar boundaries can still be preserved, as long as it's coerced to the right width (done by coerce_reg_to_size). Even further, if the actual value fits into the fill width, the ID can be preserved as well for further tracking of equal scalars. Implement the above improvements, which makes narrowing fills behave the same as narrowing spills and MOVs between registers. Two tests are adjusted to accommodate for endianness differences and to take into account that it's now allowed to do a narrowing fill from the least significant bits. reg_bounds_sync is added to coerce_reg_to_size to correctly adjust umin/umax boundaries after the var_off truncation, for example, a 64-bit value 0xXXXXXXXX00000000, when read as a 32-bit, gets umin = 0, umax = 0xFFFFFFFF, var_off = (0x0; 0xffffffff00000000), which needs to be synced down to umax = 0, otherwise reg_bounds_sanity_check doesn't pass. Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240127175237.526726-4-maxtram95@gmail.com --- include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 9 +++++++ kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 15 ++++++++--- .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spill_fill.c | 26 ++++++++++++++----- 3 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h index 0dcde339dc7e..84365e6dd85d 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h @@ -919,6 +919,15 @@ static inline void mark_verifier_state_scratched(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) env->scratched_stack_slots = ~0ULL; } +static inline bool bpf_stack_narrow_access_ok(int off, int fill_size, int spill_size) +{ +#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN + off -= spill_size - fill_size; +#endif + + return !(off % BPF_REG_SIZE); +} + const char *reg_type_str(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, enum bpf_reg_type type); const char *dynptr_type_str(enum bpf_dynptr_type type); const char *iter_type_str(const struct btf *btf, u32 btf_id); diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 28f62f24da7e..82af971926ac 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -4778,7 +4778,8 @@ static int check_stack_read_fixed_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, if (dst_regno < 0) return 0; - if (!(off % BPF_REG_SIZE) && size == spill_size) { + if (size <= spill_size && + bpf_stack_narrow_access_ok(off, size, spill_size)) { /* The earlier check_reg_arg() has decided the * subreg_def for this insn. Save it first. */ @@ -4786,6 +4787,12 @@ static int check_stack_read_fixed_off(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, copy_register_state(&state->regs[dst_regno], reg); state->regs[dst_regno].subreg_def = subreg_def; + + /* Break the relation on a narrowing fill. + * coerce_reg_to_size will adjust the boundaries. + */ + if (get_reg_width(reg) > size * BITS_PER_BYTE) + state->regs[dst_regno].id = 0; } else { int spill_cnt = 0, zero_cnt = 0; @@ -6061,10 +6068,10 @@ static void coerce_reg_to_size(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int size) * values are also truncated so we push 64-bit bounds into * 32-bit bounds. Above were truncated < 32-bits already. */ - if (size < 4) { + if (size < 4) __mark_reg32_unbounded(reg); - reg_bounds_sync(reg); - } + + reg_bounds_sync(reg); } static void set_sext64_default_val(struct bpf_reg_state *reg, int size) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spill_fill.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spill_fill.c index f9803005e1c0..3e5d063ea7e8 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spill_fill.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spill_fill.c @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ __naked void uninit_u32_from_the_stack(void) SEC("tc") __description("Spill a u32 const scalar. Refill as u16. Offset to skb->data") -__failure __msg("invalid access to packet") +__success __retval(0) __naked void u16_offset_to_skb_data(void) { asm volatile (" \ @@ -225,13 +225,19 @@ __naked void u16_offset_to_skb_data(void) r3 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data_end]); \ w4 = 20; \ *(u32*)(r10 - 8) = r4; \ - r4 = *(u16*)(r10 - 8); \ + " +#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ + "r4 = *(u16*)(r10 - 8);" +#else + "r4 = *(u16*)(r10 - 6);" +#endif + " \ r0 = r2; \ - /* r0 += r4 R0=pkt R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=umax=65535 */\ + /* r0 += r4 R0=pkt R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=20 */\ r0 += r4; \ - /* if (r0 > r3) R0=pkt,umax=65535 R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=umax=65535 */\ + /* if (r0 > r3) R0=pkt,off=20 R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=20 */\ if r0 > r3 goto l0_%=; \ - /* r0 = *(u32 *)r2 R0=pkt,umax=65535 R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=20 */\ + /* r0 = *(u32 *)r2 R0=pkt,off=20 R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=20 */\ r0 = *(u32*)(r2 + 0); \ l0_%=: r0 = 0; \ exit; \ @@ -268,7 +274,7 @@ l0_%=: r0 = 0; \ } SEC("tc") -__description("Spill a u32 const scalar. Refill as u16 from fp-6. Offset to skb->data") +__description("Spill a u32 const scalar. Refill as u16 from MSB. Offset to skb->data") __failure __msg("invalid access to packet") __naked void _6_offset_to_skb_data(void) { @@ -277,7 +283,13 @@ __naked void _6_offset_to_skb_data(void) r3 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data_end]); \ w4 = 20; \ *(u32*)(r10 - 8) = r4; \ - r4 = *(u16*)(r10 - 6); \ + " +#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ + "r4 = *(u16*)(r10 - 6);" +#else + "r4 = *(u16*)(r10 - 8);" +#endif + " \ r0 = r2; \ /* r0 += r4 R0=pkt R2=pkt R3=pkt_end R4=umax=65535 */\ r0 += r4; \ From 067313a85c6f213932518f12f628810f0092492b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Maxim Mikityanskiy Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 19:52:35 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 4/6] selftests/bpf: Add test cases for narrowing fill The previous commit allowed to preserve boundaries and track IDs of scalars on narrowing fills. Add test cases for that pattern. Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240127175237.526726-5-maxtram95@gmail.com --- .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spill_fill.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 111 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spill_fill.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spill_fill.c index 3e5d063ea7e8..7f3b1319bd99 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spill_fill.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spill_fill.c @@ -979,4 +979,115 @@ l0_%=: r0 = 0; \ : __clobber_all); } +SEC("xdp") +__description("32-bit fill after 64-bit spill") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void fill_32bit_after_spill_64bit(void) +{ + asm volatile(" \ + /* Randomize the upper 32 bits. */ \ + call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32]; \ + r0 <<= 32; \ + /* 64-bit spill r0 to stack. */ \ + *(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r0; \ + /* 32-bit fill r0 from stack. */ \ + " +#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ + "r0 = *(u32*)(r10 - 8);" +#else + "r0 = *(u32*)(r10 - 4);" +#endif + " \ + /* Boundary check on r0 with predetermined result. */\ + if r0 == 0 goto l0_%=; \ + /* Dead branch: the verifier should prune it. Do an invalid memory\ + * access if the verifier follows it. \ + */ \ + r0 = *(u64*)(r9 + 0); \ +l0_%=: exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("xdp") +__description("32-bit fill after 64-bit spill of 32-bit value should preserve ID") +__success __retval(0) +__naked void fill_32bit_after_spill_64bit_preserve_id(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + /* Randomize the lower 32 bits. */ \ + call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32]; \ + w0 &= 0xffffffff; \ + /* 64-bit spill r0 to stack - should assign an ID. */\ + *(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r0; \ + /* 32-bit fill r1 from stack - should preserve the ID. */\ + " +#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ + "r1 = *(u32*)(r10 - 8);" +#else + "r1 = *(u32*)(r10 - 4);" +#endif + " \ + /* Compare r1 with another register to trigger find_equal_scalars. */\ + r2 = 0; \ + if r1 != r2 goto l0_%=; \ + /* The result of this comparison is predefined. */\ + if r0 == r2 goto l0_%=; \ + /* Dead branch: the verifier should prune it. Do an invalid memory\ + * access if the verifier follows it. \ + */ \ + r0 = *(u64*)(r9 + 0); \ + exit; \ +l0_%=: r0 = 0; \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32) + : __clobber_all); +} + +SEC("xdp") +__description("32-bit fill after 64-bit spill should clear ID") +__failure __msg("math between ctx pointer and 4294967295 is not allowed") +__naked void fill_32bit_after_spill_64bit_clear_id(void) +{ + asm volatile (" \ + r6 = r1; \ + /* Roll one bit to force the verifier to track both branches. */\ + call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32]; \ + r0 &= 0x8; \ + /* Put a large number into r1. */ \ + r1 = 0xffffffff; \ + r1 <<= 32; \ + r1 += r0; \ + /* 64-bit spill r1 to stack - should assign an ID. */\ + *(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r1; \ + /* 32-bit fill r2 from stack - should clear the ID. */\ + " +#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__ + "r2 = *(u32*)(r10 - 8);" +#else + "r2 = *(u32*)(r10 - 4);" +#endif + " \ + /* Compare r2 with another register to trigger find_equal_scalars.\ + * Having one random bit is important here, otherwise the verifier cuts\ + * the corners. If the ID was mistakenly preserved on fill, this would\ + * cause the verifier to think that r1 is also equal to zero in one of\ + * the branches, and equal to eight on the other branch.\ + */ \ + r3 = 0; \ + if r2 != r3 goto l0_%=; \ +l0_%=: r1 >>= 32; \ + /* The verifier shouldn't propagate r2's range to r1, so it should\ + * still remember r1 = 0xffffffff and reject the below.\ + */ \ + r6 += r1; \ + r0 = *(u32*)(r6 + 0); \ + exit; \ +" : + : __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32) + : __clobber_all); +} + char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; From 6efbde200bf3cf2dbf6e7181893fed13a79c789b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eduard Zingerman Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 19:52:36 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 5/6] bpf: Handle scalar spill vs all MISC in stacksafe() When check_stack_read_fixed_off() reads value from an spi all stack slots of which are set to STACK_{MISC,INVALID}, the destination register is set to unbound SCALAR_VALUE. Exploit this fact by allowing stacksafe() to use a fake unbound scalar register to compare 'mmmm mmmm' stack value in old state vs spilled 64-bit scalar in current state and vice versa. Veristat results after this patch show some gains: ./veristat -C -e file,prog,states -f 'states_pct>10' not-opt after File Program States (DIFF) ----------------------- --------------------- --------------- bpf_overlay.o tail_rev_nodeport_lb4 -45 (-15.85%) bpf_xdp.o tail_lb_ipv4 -541 (-19.57%) pyperf100.bpf.o on_event -680 (-10.42%) pyperf180.bpf.o on_event -2164 (-19.62%) pyperf600.bpf.o on_event -9799 (-24.84%) strobemeta.bpf.o on_event -9157 (-65.28%) xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.o syncookie_tc -54 (-19.29%) xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.o syncookie_xdp -74 (-24.50%) Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240127175237.526726-6-maxtram95@gmail.com --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 82af971926ac..a0b8e400b3df 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -1155,6 +1155,12 @@ static bool is_spilled_scalar_reg(const struct bpf_stack_state *stack) stack->spilled_ptr.type == SCALAR_VALUE; } +static bool is_spilled_scalar_reg64(const struct bpf_stack_state *stack) +{ + return stack->slot_type[0] == STACK_SPILL && + stack->spilled_ptr.type == SCALAR_VALUE; +} + /* Mark stack slot as STACK_MISC, unless it is already STACK_INVALID, in which * case they are equivalent, or it's STACK_ZERO, in which case we preserve * more precise STACK_ZERO. @@ -2264,8 +2270,7 @@ static void __reg_assign_32_into_64(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) } /* Mark a register as having a completely unknown (scalar) value. */ -static void __mark_reg_unknown(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, - struct bpf_reg_state *reg) +static void __mark_reg_unknown_imprecise(struct bpf_reg_state *reg) { /* * Clear type, off, and union(map_ptr, range) and @@ -2277,10 +2282,20 @@ static void __mark_reg_unknown(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, reg->ref_obj_id = 0; reg->var_off = tnum_unknown; reg->frameno = 0; - reg->precise = !env->bpf_capable; + reg->precise = false; __mark_reg_unbounded(reg); } +/* Mark a register as having a completely unknown (scalar) value, + * initialize .precise as true when not bpf capable. + */ +static void __mark_reg_unknown(const struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_reg_state *reg) +{ + __mark_reg_unknown_imprecise(reg); + reg->precise = !env->bpf_capable; +} + static void mark_reg_unknown(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *regs, u32 regno) { @@ -16486,6 +16501,43 @@ static bool regsafe(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_reg_state *rold, } } +static struct bpf_reg_state unbound_reg; + +static __init int unbound_reg_init(void) +{ + __mark_reg_unknown_imprecise(&unbound_reg); + unbound_reg.live |= REG_LIVE_READ; + return 0; +} +late_initcall(unbound_reg_init); + +static bool is_stack_all_misc(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_stack_state *stack) +{ + u32 i; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(stack->slot_type); ++i) { + if ((stack->slot_type[i] == STACK_MISC) || + (stack->slot_type[i] == STACK_INVALID && env->allow_uninit_stack)) + continue; + return false; + } + + return true; +} + +static struct bpf_reg_state *scalar_reg_for_stack(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, + struct bpf_stack_state *stack) +{ + if (is_spilled_scalar_reg64(stack)) + return &stack->spilled_ptr; + + if (is_stack_all_misc(env, stack)) + return &unbound_reg; + + return NULL; +} + static bool stacksafe(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_func_state *old, struct bpf_func_state *cur, struct bpf_idmap *idmap, bool exact) { @@ -16524,6 +16576,20 @@ static bool stacksafe(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_func_state *old, if (i >= cur->allocated_stack) return false; + /* 64-bit scalar spill vs all slots MISC and vice versa. + * Load from all slots MISC produces unbound scalar. + * Construct a fake register for such stack and call + * regsafe() to ensure scalar ids are compared. + */ + old_reg = scalar_reg_for_stack(env, &old->stack[spi]); + cur_reg = scalar_reg_for_stack(env, &cur->stack[spi]); + if (old_reg && cur_reg) { + if (!regsafe(env, old_reg, cur_reg, idmap, exact)) + return false; + i += BPF_REG_SIZE - 1; + continue; + } + /* if old state was safe with misc data in the stack * it will be safe with zero-initialized stack. * The opposite is not true From 73a28d9d000e8d20b4b3c516b74ee92afe3ae4be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eduard Zingerman Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2024 19:52:37 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 6/6] selftests/bpf: States pruning checks for scalar vs STACK_MISC Check that stacksafe() compares spilled scalars with STACK_MISC. The following combinations are explored: - old spill of imprecise scalar is equivalent to cur STACK_{MISC,INVALID} (plus error in unpriv mode); - old spill of precise scalar is not equivalent to cur STACK_MISC; - old STACK_MISC is equivalent to cur scalar; - old STACK_MISC is not equivalent to cur non-scalar. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240127175237.526726-7-maxtram95@gmail.com --- .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spill_fill.c | 154 ++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 154 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spill_fill.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spill_fill.c index 7f3b1319bd99..85e48069c9e6 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spill_fill.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spill_fill.c @@ -1090,4 +1090,158 @@ l0_%=: r1 >>= 32; \ : __clobber_all); } +/* stacksafe(): check if stack spill of an imprecise scalar in old state + * is considered equivalent to STACK_{MISC,INVALID} in cur state. + */ +SEC("socket") +__success __log_level(2) +__msg("8: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8)") +__msg("8: safe") +__msg("processed 11 insns") +/* STACK_INVALID should prevent verifier in unpriv mode from + * considering states equivalent and force an error on second + * verification path (entry - label 1 - label 2). + */ +__failure_unpriv +__msg_unpriv("8: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8)") +__msg_unpriv("9: (95) exit") +__msg_unpriv("8: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8)") +__msg_unpriv("invalid read from stack off -8+2 size 8") +__flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ) +__naked void old_imprecise_scalar_vs_cur_stack_misc(void) +{ + asm volatile( + /* get a random value for branching */ + "call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];" + "if r0 == 0 goto 1f;" + /* conjure scalar at fp-8 */ + "r0 = 42;" + "*(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r0;" + "goto 2f;" +"1:" + /* conjure STACK_{MISC,INVALID} at fp-8 */ + "call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];" + "*(u16*)(r10 - 8) = r0;" + "*(u16*)(r10 - 4) = r0;" +"2:" + /* read fp-8, should be considered safe on second visit */ + "r1 = *(u64*)(r10 - 8);" + "exit;" + : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +/* stacksafe(): check that stack spill of a precise scalar in old state + * is not considered equivalent to STACK_MISC in cur state. + */ +SEC("socket") +__success __log_level(2) +/* verifier should visit 'if r1 == 0x2a ...' two times: + * - once for path entry - label 2; + * - once for path entry - label 1 - label 2. + */ +__msg("if r1 == 0x2a goto pc+0") +__msg("if r1 == 0x2a goto pc+0") +__msg("processed 15 insns") +__flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ) +__naked void old_precise_scalar_vs_cur_stack_misc(void) +{ + asm volatile( + /* get a random value for branching */ + "call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];" + "if r0 == 0 goto 1f;" + /* conjure scalar at fp-8 */ + "r0 = 42;" + "*(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r0;" + "goto 2f;" +"1:" + /* conjure STACK_MISC at fp-8 */ + "call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];" + "*(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r0;" + "*(u32*)(r10 - 4) = r0;" +"2:" + /* read fp-8, should not be considered safe on second visit */ + "r1 = *(u64*)(r10 - 8);" + /* use r1 in precise context */ + "if r1 == 42 goto +0;" + "exit;" + : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +/* stacksafe(): check if STACK_MISC in old state is considered + * equivalent to stack spill of a scalar in cur state. + */ +SEC("socket") +__success __log_level(2) +__msg("8: (79) r0 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8)") +__msg("8: safe") +__msg("processed 11 insns") +__flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ) +__naked void old_stack_misc_vs_cur_scalar(void) +{ + asm volatile( + /* get a random value for branching */ + "call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];" + "if r0 == 0 goto 1f;" + /* conjure STACK_{MISC,INVALID} at fp-8 */ + "call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];" + "*(u16*)(r10 - 8) = r0;" + "*(u16*)(r10 - 4) = r0;" + "goto 2f;" +"1:" + /* conjure scalar at fp-8 */ + "r0 = 42;" + "*(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r0;" +"2:" + /* read fp-8, should be considered safe on second visit */ + "r0 = *(u64*)(r10 - 8);" + "exit;" + : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + +/* stacksafe(): check that STACK_MISC in old state is not considered + * equivalent to stack spill of a non-scalar in cur state. + */ +SEC("socket") +__success __log_level(2) +/* verifier should process exit instructions twice: + * - once for path entry - label 2; + * - once for path entry - label 1 - label 2. + */ +__msg("r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8)") +__msg("exit") +__msg("r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8)") +__msg("exit") +__msg("processed 11 insns") +__flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ) +__naked void old_stack_misc_vs_cur_ctx_ptr(void) +{ + asm volatile( + /* remember context pointer in r9 */ + "r9 = r1;" + /* get a random value for branching */ + "call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];" + "if r0 == 0 goto 1f;" + /* conjure STACK_MISC at fp-8 */ + "call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns];" + "*(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r0;" + "*(u32*)(r10 - 4) = r0;" + "goto 2f;" +"1:" + /* conjure context pointer in fp-8 */ + "*(u64*)(r10 - 8) = r9;" +"2:" + /* read fp-8, should not be considered safe on second visit */ + "r1 = *(u64*)(r10 - 8);" + "exit;" + : + : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns) + : __clobber_all); +} + char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";