[IPV6] address: Support NLM_F_EXCL when adding addresses
iproute2 doesn't provide the NLM_F_CREATE flag when adding addresses, it is assumed to be implied. The existing code issues a check on said flag when the modify operation fails (likely due to ENOENT) before continueing to create it, this leads to a hard to predict result, therefore the NLM_F_CREATE check is removed. Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
680a27a23a
commit
7198f8cec1
@ -2908,24 +2908,14 @@ inet6_rtm_deladdr(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, void *arg)
|
|||||||
return inet6_addr_del(ifm->ifa_index, pfx, ifm->ifa_prefixlen);
|
return inet6_addr_del(ifm->ifa_index, pfx, ifm->ifa_prefixlen);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static int
|
static int inet6_addr_modify(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp, u32 prefered_lft,
|
||||||
inet6_addr_modify(int ifindex, struct in6_addr *pfx,
|
u32 valid_lft)
|
||||||
__u32 prefered_lft, __u32 valid_lft)
|
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp = NULL;
|
|
||||||
struct net_device *dev;
|
|
||||||
int ifa_flags = 0;
|
int ifa_flags = 0;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if ((dev = __dev_get_by_index(ifindex)) == NULL)
|
|
||||||
return -ENODEV;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (!valid_lft || (prefered_lft > valid_lft))
|
if (!valid_lft || (prefered_lft > valid_lft))
|
||||||
return -EINVAL;
|
return -EINVAL;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
ifp = ipv6_get_ifaddr(pfx, dev, 1);
|
|
||||||
if (ifp == NULL)
|
|
||||||
return -ENOENT;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (valid_lft == INFINITY_LIFE_TIME)
|
if (valid_lft == INFINITY_LIFE_TIME)
|
||||||
ifa_flags = IFA_F_PERMANENT;
|
ifa_flags = IFA_F_PERMANENT;
|
||||||
else if (valid_lft >= 0x7FFFFFFF/HZ)
|
else if (valid_lft >= 0x7FFFFFFF/HZ)
|
||||||
@ -2947,7 +2937,6 @@ inet6_addr_modify(int ifindex, struct in6_addr *pfx,
|
|||||||
spin_unlock_bh(&ifp->lock);
|
spin_unlock_bh(&ifp->lock);
|
||||||
if (!(ifp->flags&IFA_F_TENTATIVE))
|
if (!(ifp->flags&IFA_F_TENTATIVE))
|
||||||
ipv6_ifa_notify(0, ifp);
|
ipv6_ifa_notify(0, ifp);
|
||||||
in6_ifa_put(ifp);
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
addrconf_verify(0);
|
addrconf_verify(0);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -2960,6 +2949,8 @@ inet6_rtm_newaddr(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, void *arg)
|
|||||||
struct ifaddrmsg *ifm;
|
struct ifaddrmsg *ifm;
|
||||||
struct nlattr *tb[IFA_MAX+1];
|
struct nlattr *tb[IFA_MAX+1];
|
||||||
struct in6_addr *pfx;
|
struct in6_addr *pfx;
|
||||||
|
struct inet6_ifaddr *ifa;
|
||||||
|
struct net_device *dev;
|
||||||
u32 valid_lft, preferred_lft;
|
u32 valid_lft, preferred_lft;
|
||||||
int err;
|
int err;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -2983,15 +2974,29 @@ inet6_rtm_newaddr(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, void *arg)
|
|||||||
valid_lft = INFINITY_LIFE_TIME;
|
valid_lft = INFINITY_LIFE_TIME;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_REPLACE) {
|
dev = __dev_get_by_index(ifm->ifa_index);
|
||||||
err = inet6_addr_modify(ifm->ifa_index, pfx,
|
if (dev == NULL)
|
||||||
preferred_lft, valid_lft);
|
return -ENODEV;
|
||||||
if (err == 0 || !(nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_CREATE))
|
|
||||||
return err;
|
ifa = ipv6_get_ifaddr(pfx, dev, 1);
|
||||||
|
if (ifa == NULL) {
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* It would be best to check for !NLM_F_CREATE here but
|
||||||
|
* userspace alreay relies on not having to provide this.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
return inet6_addr_add(ifm->ifa_index, pfx, ifm->ifa_prefixlen,
|
||||||
|
preferred_lft, valid_lft);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return inet6_addr_add(ifm->ifa_index, pfx, ifm->ifa_prefixlen,
|
if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_EXCL ||
|
||||||
preferred_lft, valid_lft);
|
!(nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_REPLACE))
|
||||||
|
err = -EEXIST;
|
||||||
|
else
|
||||||
|
err = inet6_addr_modify(ifa, preferred_lft, valid_lft);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
in6_ifa_put(ifa);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
return err;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
static void put_ifaddrmsg(struct nlmsghdr *nlh, u8 prefixlen, u8 flags,
|
static void put_ifaddrmsg(struct nlmsghdr *nlh, u8 prefixlen, u8 flags,
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user