ALSA: opti9xx: mark expected switch fall-throughs
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 402016 ("Missing break in switch") Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1056542 ("Missing break in switch") Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1339579 ("Missing break in switch") Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1369526 ("Missing break in switch") Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1369529 ("Missing break in switch") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3e313f3472
commit
734be97b96
@ -176,10 +176,13 @@ static int aci_busy_wait(struct snd_miro_aci *aci)
|
||||
switch (timeout-ACI_MINTIME) {
|
||||
case 0 ... 9:
|
||||
out /= 10;
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case 10 ... 19:
|
||||
out /= 10;
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
case 20 ... 30:
|
||||
out /= 10;
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
default:
|
||||
set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
|
||||
schedule_timeout(out);
|
||||
@ -834,6 +837,7 @@ static unsigned char snd_miro_read(struct snd_miro *chip,
|
||||
retval = inb(chip->mc_base + 9);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
|
||||
case OPTi9XX_HW_82C929:
|
||||
retval = inb(chip->mc_base + reg);
|
||||
@ -863,6 +867,7 @@ static void snd_miro_write(struct snd_miro *chip, unsigned char reg,
|
||||
outb(value, chip->mc_base + 9);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* fall through */
|
||||
|
||||
case OPTi9XX_HW_82C929:
|
||||
outb(value, chip->mc_base + reg);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user