9p/trans_fd: Fix concurrency del of req_list in p9_fd_cancelled/p9_read_work
p9_read_work and p9_fd_cancelled may be called concurrently.
In some cases, req->req_list may be deleted by both p9_read_work
and p9_fd_cancelled.
We can fix it by ignoring replies associated with a cancelled
request and ignoring cancelled request if message has been received
before lock.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200612090833.36149-1-wanghai38@huawei.com
Fixes: 60ff779c4a
("9p: client: remove unused code and any reference to "cancelled" function")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.12+
Reported-by: syzbot+77a25acfa0382e06ab23@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Wang Hai <wanghai38@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@codewreck.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a39c46067c
commit
74d6a5d566
@ -362,6 +362,10 @@ static void p9_read_work(struct work_struct *work)
|
||||
if (m->rreq->status == REQ_STATUS_SENT) {
|
||||
list_del(&m->rreq->req_list);
|
||||
p9_client_cb(m->client, m->rreq, REQ_STATUS_RCVD);
|
||||
} else if (m->rreq->status == REQ_STATUS_FLSHD) {
|
||||
/* Ignore replies associated with a cancelled request. */
|
||||
p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_TRANS,
|
||||
"Ignore replies associated with a cancelled request\n");
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
spin_unlock(&m->client->lock);
|
||||
p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_ERROR,
|
||||
@ -703,11 +707,20 @@ static int p9_fd_cancelled(struct p9_client *client, struct p9_req_t *req)
|
||||
{
|
||||
p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_TRANS, "client %p req %p\n", client, req);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&client->lock);
|
||||
/* Ignore cancelled request if message has been received
|
||||
* before lock.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (req->status == REQ_STATUS_RCVD) {
|
||||
spin_unlock(&client->lock);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* we haven't received a response for oldreq,
|
||||
* remove it from the list.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
spin_lock(&client->lock);
|
||||
list_del(&req->req_list);
|
||||
req->status = REQ_STATUS_FLSHD;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&client->lock);
|
||||
p9_req_put(req);
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user