netfilter: compat: reject huge allocation requests

commit 7d7d7e02111e9a4dc9d0658597f528f815d820fd upstream.

no need to bother even trying to allocating huge compat offset arrays,
such ruleset is rejected later on anyway becaus we refuse to allocate
overly large rule blobs.

However, compat translation happens before blob allocation, so we should
add a check there too.

This is supposed to help with fuzzing by avoiding oom-killer.

Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Florian Westphal 2018-02-27 19:42:35 +01:00 committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman
parent 8d92d53365
commit 764f2162d9

View File

@ -555,14 +555,8 @@ int xt_compat_add_offset(u_int8_t af, unsigned int offset, int delta)
{
struct xt_af *xp = &xt[af];
if (!xp->compat_tab) {
if (!xp->number)
return -EINVAL;
xp->compat_tab = vmalloc(sizeof(struct compat_delta) * xp->number);
if (!xp->compat_tab)
return -ENOMEM;
xp->cur = 0;
}
if (WARN_ON(!xp->compat_tab))
return -ENOMEM;
if (xp->cur >= xp->number)
return -EINVAL;
@ -607,6 +601,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xt_compat_calc_jump);
int xt_compat_init_offsets(u8 af, unsigned int number)
{
size_t mem;
if (!number || number > (INT_MAX / sizeof(struct compat_delta)))
return -EINVAL;
if (WARN_ON(xt[af].compat_tab))
return -EINVAL;
mem = sizeof(struct compat_delta) * number;
if (mem > XT_MAX_TABLE_SIZE)
return -ENOMEM;
xt[af].compat_tab = vmalloc(mem);
if (!xt[af].compat_tab)
return -ENOMEM;
xt[af].number = number;
xt[af].cur = 0;