drm/i915: update the PC8 and runtime PM documentation
Now that PC8 got much simpler, there are less things to document. Also, runtime PM already has a nice documentation, so we don't need to re-explain it on our driver. v2: - Rebase. - Fix typo (Jesse). Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a14cb6fc85
commit
765dab6752
@ -1337,47 +1337,19 @@ struct ilk_wm_values {
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This struct tracks the state needed for the Package C8+ feature.
|
||||
* This struct helps tracking the state needed for runtime PM, which puts the
|
||||
* device in PCI D3 state. Notice that when this happens, nothing on the
|
||||
* graphics device works, even register access, so we don't get interrupts nor
|
||||
* anything else.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* TODO: we're merging the Package C8+ feature with the runtime PM support. To
|
||||
* avoid having to update the documentation at each patch of the series, we'll
|
||||
* do a final update at the end.
|
||||
* Every piece of our code that needs to actually touch the hardware needs to
|
||||
* either call intel_runtime_pm_get or call intel_display_power_get with the
|
||||
* appropriate power domain.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Package states C8 and deeper are really deep PC states that can only be
|
||||
* reached when all the devices on the system allow it, so even if the graphics
|
||||
* device allows PC8+, it doesn't mean the system will actually get to these
|
||||
* states.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Our driver only allows PC8+ when all the outputs are disabled, the power well
|
||||
* is disabled and the GPU is idle. When these conditions are met, we manually
|
||||
* do the other conditions: disable the interrupts, clocks and switch LCPLL
|
||||
* refclk to Fclk.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* When we really reach PC8 or deeper states (not just when we allow it) we lose
|
||||
* the state of some registers, so when we come back from PC8+ we need to
|
||||
* restore this state. We don't get into PC8+ if we're not in RC6, so we don't
|
||||
* need to take care of the registers kept by RC6.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The interrupt disabling is part of the requirements. We can only leave the
|
||||
* PCH HPD interrupts enabled. If we're in PC8+ and we get another interrupt we
|
||||
* can lock the machine.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Ideally every piece of our code that needs PC8+ disabled would call
|
||||
* hsw_disable_package_c8, which would increment disable_count and prevent the
|
||||
* system from reaching PC8+. But we don't have a symmetric way to do this for
|
||||
* everything, so we have the requirements_met variable. When we switch
|
||||
* requirements_met to true we decrease disable_count, and increase it in the
|
||||
* opposite case. The requirements_met variable is true when all the CRTCs,
|
||||
* encoders and the power well are disabled.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* In addition to everything, we only actually enable PC8+ if disable_count
|
||||
* stays at zero for at least some seconds. This is implemented with the
|
||||
* enable_work variable. We do this so we don't enable/disable PC8 dozens of
|
||||
* consecutive times when all screens are disabled and some background app
|
||||
* queries the state of our connectors, or we have some application constantly
|
||||
* waking up to use the GPU. Only after the enable_work function actually
|
||||
* enables PC8+ the "enable" variable will become true, which means that it can
|
||||
* be false even if disable_count is 0.
|
||||
* Our driver uses the autosuspend delay feature, which means we'll only really
|
||||
* suspend if we stay with zero refcount for a certain amount of time. The
|
||||
* default value is currently very conservative (see intel_init_runtime_pm), but
|
||||
* it can be changed with the standard runtime PM files from sysfs.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The irqs_disabled variable becomes true exactly after we disable the IRQs and
|
||||
* goes back to false exactly before we reenable the IRQs. We use this variable
|
||||
@ -1387,7 +1359,7 @@ struct ilk_wm_values {
|
||||
* inside struct regsave so when we restore the IRQs they will contain the
|
||||
* latest expected values.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* For more, read "Display Sequences for Package C8" on our documentation.
|
||||
* For more, read the Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct i915_runtime_pm {
|
||||
bool suspended;
|
||||
|
@ -7024,6 +7024,29 @@ static void hsw_restore_lcpll(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Package states C8 and deeper are really deep PC states that can only be
|
||||
* reached when all the devices on the system allow it, so even if the graphics
|
||||
* device allows PC8+, it doesn't mean the system will actually get to these
|
||||
* states. Our driver only allows PC8+ when going into runtime PM.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The requirements for PC8+ are that all the outputs are disabled, the power
|
||||
* well is disabled and most interrupts are disabled, and these are also
|
||||
* requirements for runtime PM. When these conditions are met, we manually do
|
||||
* the other conditions: disable the interrupts, clocks and switch LCPLL refclk
|
||||
* to Fclk. If we're in PC8+ and we get an non-hotplug interrupt, we can hard
|
||||
* hang the machine.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* When we really reach PC8 or deeper states (not just when we allow it) we lose
|
||||
* the state of some registers, so when we come back from PC8+ we need to
|
||||
* restore this state. We don't get into PC8+ if we're not in RC6, so we don't
|
||||
* need to take care of the registers kept by RC6. Notice that this happens even
|
||||
* if we don't put the device in PCI D3 state (which is what currently happens
|
||||
* because of the runtime PM support).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* For more, read "Display Sequences for Package C8" on the hardware
|
||||
* documentation.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void hsw_enable_pc8(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct drm_device *dev = dev_priv->dev;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user