untangling ep_call_nested(): and there was much rejoicing
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
99d84d4330
commit
773318eddb
@ -439,25 +439,6 @@ static bool ep_push_nested(void *cookie)
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* ep_call_nested - Perform a bound (possibly) nested call, by checking
|
||||
* that the recursion limit is not exceeded, and that
|
||||
* the same nested call (by the meaning of same cookie) is
|
||||
* no re-entered.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @nproc: Nested call core function pointer.
|
||||
* @priv: Opaque data to be passed to the @nproc callback.
|
||||
* @cookie: Cookie to be used to identify this nested call.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Returns: Returns the code returned by the @nproc callback, or -1 if
|
||||
* the maximum recursion limit has been exceeded.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int ep_call_nested(int (*nproc)(void *, void *, int), void *priv,
|
||||
void *cookie)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return (*nproc)(priv, cookie, nesting);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* As described in commit 0ccf831cb lockdep: annotate epoll
|
||||
* the use of wait queues used by epoll is done in a very controlled
|
||||
@ -1325,7 +1306,7 @@ static void path_count_init(void)
|
||||
path_count[i] = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int reverse_path_check_proc(void *priv, void *cookie, int call_nests)
|
||||
static int reverse_path_check_proc(void *priv, void *cookie, int depth)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int error = 0;
|
||||
struct file *file = priv;
|
||||
@ -1341,13 +1322,13 @@ static int reverse_path_check_proc(void *priv, void *cookie, int call_nests)
|
||||
child_file = epi->ep->file;
|
||||
if (is_file_epoll(child_file)) {
|
||||
if (list_empty(&child_file->f_ep_links)) {
|
||||
if (path_count_inc(call_nests)) {
|
||||
if (path_count_inc(depth)) {
|
||||
error = -1;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
error = ep_call_nested(reverse_path_check_proc,
|
||||
child_file, child_file);
|
||||
error = reverse_path_check_proc(child_file, child_file,
|
||||
depth + 1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (error != 0)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
@ -1379,8 +1360,7 @@ static int reverse_path_check(void)
|
||||
/* let's call this for all tfiles */
|
||||
list_for_each_entry(current_file, &tfile_check_list, f_tfile_llink) {
|
||||
path_count_init();
|
||||
error = ep_call_nested(reverse_path_check_proc, current_file,
|
||||
current_file);
|
||||
error = reverse_path_check_proc(current_file, current_file, 0);
|
||||
if (error)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1886,8 +1866,7 @@ send_events:
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* ep_loop_check_proc - Callback function to be passed to the @ep_call_nested()
|
||||
* API, to verify that adding an epoll file inside another
|
||||
* ep_loop_check_proc - verify that adding an epoll file inside another
|
||||
* epoll structure, does not violate the constraints, in
|
||||
* terms of closed loops, or too deep chains (which can
|
||||
* result in excessive stack usage).
|
||||
@ -1900,7 +1879,7 @@ send_events:
|
||||
* Returns: Returns zero if adding the epoll @file inside current epoll
|
||||
* structure @ep does not violate the constraints, or -1 otherwise.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int ep_loop_check_proc(void *priv, void *cookie, int call_nests)
|
||||
static int ep_loop_check_proc(void *priv, void *cookie, int depth)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int error = 0;
|
||||
struct file *file = priv;
|
||||
@ -1912,7 +1891,7 @@ static int ep_loop_check_proc(void *priv, void *cookie, int call_nests)
|
||||
if (!ep_push_nested(cookie)) /* limits recursion */
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock_nested(&ep->mtx, call_nests + 1);
|
||||
mutex_lock_nested(&ep->mtx, depth + 1);
|
||||
ep->gen = loop_check_gen;
|
||||
for (rbp = rb_first_cached(&ep->rbr); rbp; rbp = rb_next(rbp)) {
|
||||
epi = rb_entry(rbp, struct epitem, rbn);
|
||||
@ -1920,8 +1899,8 @@ static int ep_loop_check_proc(void *priv, void *cookie, int call_nests)
|
||||
ep_tovisit = epi->ffd.file->private_data;
|
||||
if (ep_tovisit->gen == loop_check_gen)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
error = ep_call_nested(ep_loop_check_proc, epi->ffd.file,
|
||||
ep_tovisit);
|
||||
error = ep_loop_check_proc(epi->ffd.file, ep_tovisit,
|
||||
depth + 1);
|
||||
if (error != 0)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
@ -1959,7 +1938,7 @@ static int ep_loop_check_proc(void *priv, void *cookie, int call_nests)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int ep_loop_check(struct eventpoll *ep, struct file *file)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return ep_call_nested(ep_loop_check_proc, file, ep);
|
||||
return ep_loop_check_proc(file, ep, 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void clear_tfile_check_list(void)
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user