From 782e5e7925880f737963444f141a0320a12104a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ian Forbes Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 15:07:00 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] drm/vmwgfx: Fix Legacy Display Unit Legacy DU was broken by the referenced fixes commit because the placement and the busy_placement no longer pointed to the same object. This was later fixed indirectly by commit a78a8da51b36c7a0c0c16233f91d60aac03a5a49 ("drm/ttm: replace busy placement with flags v6") in v6.9. Fixes: 39985eea5a6d ("drm/vmwgfx: Abstract placement selection") Signed-off-by: Ian Forbes Cc: # v6.4+ Reviewed-by: Zack Rusin Signed-off-by: Zack Rusin Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20240425200700.24403-1-ian.forbes@broadcom.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c index e5eb21a471a6..00144632c600 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_bo.c @@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ int vmw_bo_pin_in_start_of_vram(struct vmw_private *dev_priv, VMW_BO_DOMAIN_VRAM, VMW_BO_DOMAIN_VRAM); buf->places[0].lpfn = PFN_UP(bo->resource->size); + buf->busy_places[0].lpfn = PFN_UP(bo->resource->size); ret = ttm_bo_validate(bo, &buf->placement, &ctx); /* For some reason we didn't end up at the start of vram */