vduse: Use proper spinlock for IRQ injection
The IRQ injection work used spin_lock_irq() to protect the scheduling of the softirq, but spin_lock_bh() should be used. With spin_lock_irq(), we noticed delay of more than 6 seconds between the time a NAPI polling work is scheduled and the time it is executed. Fixes: c8a6153b6c59 ("vduse: Introduce VDUSE - vDPA Device in Userspace") Cc: xieyongji@bytedance.com Suggested-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20230705114505.63274-1-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f46c1e1620
commit
7ca26efb09
@ -935,10 +935,10 @@ static void vduse_dev_irq_inject(struct work_struct *work)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct vduse_dev *dev = container_of(work, struct vduse_dev, inject);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&dev->irq_lock);
|
||||
spin_lock_bh(&dev->irq_lock);
|
||||
if (dev->config_cb.callback)
|
||||
dev->config_cb.callback(dev->config_cb.private);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&dev->irq_lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock_bh(&dev->irq_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void vduse_vq_irq_inject(struct work_struct *work)
|
||||
@ -946,10 +946,10 @@ static void vduse_vq_irq_inject(struct work_struct *work)
|
||||
struct vduse_virtqueue *vq = container_of(work,
|
||||
struct vduse_virtqueue, inject);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock_irq(&vq->irq_lock);
|
||||
spin_lock_bh(&vq->irq_lock);
|
||||
if (vq->ready && vq->cb.callback)
|
||||
vq->cb.callback(vq->cb.private);
|
||||
spin_unlock_irq(&vq->irq_lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock_bh(&vq->irq_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static bool vduse_vq_signal_irqfd(struct vduse_virtqueue *vq)
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user