drm/i915: Mark up i915_vma_unbind() as a potential sleeper
Whenever we want to unbind a vma, we must wait on all GPU activity to complete first. (This is what gives us the ability to do fine grained eviction and purging by only having to wait on the VMA that we need to unbind to proceed; though if pushed we can make it a rule that we are only allowed to unbind already idle VMA and move the burden of the work and organising the sleep onto the caller.) Currently, we might only sleep if the vma is still active on the GPU, but in principle i915_vma_unbind() always implies a sleep, so mark it up with a might_sleep(). Suggested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103638 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171109213450.13875-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
This commit is contained in:
parent
15e4cda950
commit
7f017b19fb
@ -743,6 +743,7 @@ int i915_vma_unbind(struct i915_vma *vma)
|
||||
/* First wait upon any activity as retiring the request may
|
||||
* have side-effects such as unpinning or even unbinding this vma.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
might_sleep();
|
||||
active = i915_vma_get_active(vma);
|
||||
if (active) {
|
||||
int idx;
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user