drm/nouveau/disp/gv100: make gv100_disp_wndw and gv100_disp_wndw_mthd static

Sparse reports these issues
wndwgv100.c:120:1: warning: symbol 'gv100_disp_wndw_mthd' was not declared. Should it be static?
wndwgv100.c:140:1: warning: symbol 'gv100_disp_wndw' was not declared. Should it be static?

These variable are only used in wndwgv100.c.  Single file variables should be static.
So use static as their storage-class specifiers.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220425131308.158635-1-trix@redhat.com
This commit is contained in:
Tom Rix 2022-04-25 09:13:08 -04:00 committed by Lyude Paul
parent 6a658c908c
commit 7f7166d0a8

View File

@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ gv100_disp_wndw_mthd_base = {
}
};
const struct nv50_disp_chan_mthd
static const struct nv50_disp_chan_mthd
gv100_disp_wndw_mthd = {
.name = "Window",
.addr = 0x001000,
@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ gv100_disp_wndw_intr(struct nv50_disp_chan *chan, bool en)
nvkm_mask(device, 0x611da4, mask, data);
}
const struct nv50_disp_chan_func
static const struct nv50_disp_chan_func
gv100_disp_wndw = {
.init = gv100_disp_dmac_init,
.fini = gv100_disp_dmac_fini,